nanog mailing list archives

Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful


From: Rik Schneider <rik () master netasset com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 11:38:15 -0800 (PST)

How about "ethical issue" 

Rik Schneider
Unix Systems Administrator
Net Asset LLC
1315 Van Ness Ave
Suite 103
Fresno CA 93721

On Tue, 28 Oct 1997, J.D. Falk wrote:

On Oct 28, Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg () ripe net> wrote: 

Some of them are esentially centralsied methods of controlling Internet
content.  Paul's anti-spam feed for instance prevents users of some
providers from seeing spam.  The user has no choice; they cannot opt to
receive spam other than by switching to another provider.  Even worse:
they may not even be aware that they are "missing" some content. 

      Users should be aware if their ISP is blocking something,
      no matter what it is.  However, that's not a technical or
      operational issue...I'm not sure what category it is.

*********************************************************
J.D. Falk                         voice: +1-650-482-2840      
Supervisor, Network Operations      fax: +1-650-482-2844
PRIORI NETWORKS, INC.              http://www.priori.net

"The People You Know.  The People You Trust."
*********************************************************




Current thread: