nanog: by date

454 messages starting Nov 01 21 and ending Nov 30 21
Date index | Thread index | Author index

Monday, 01 November

Re: possible rsync validation dos vuln Giovane C. M. Moura via NANOG
South Korea KT to pay USD$33.97 million for network outage Sean Donelan
Re: Need for historical prefix blacklist (`rogue' prefixes) information David Conrad
CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA) Neel Chauhan
RE: CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA) Ryan Hamel

Tuesday, 02 November

Re: CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA) Neel Chauhan
Fwd: [PDB Announce] Publication of Guidelines for Registering in PeeringDB Leo Vegoda
Re: CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA) Neel Chauhan
Re: CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA) P C

Wednesday, 03 November

Re: CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA) TJ Trout
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Max Tulyev

Thursday, 04 November

Re: CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA) Neel Chauhan

Friday, 05 November

Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
Verizon Fiber/underground Contact Nate Burke

Saturday, 06 November

Re: CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA) Eric Kuhnke

Monday, 08 November

Re: CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA) Tim Burke
Spoofer Report for NANOG for Oct 2021 CAIDA Spoofer Project
Re: CenturyLink Fiber Latency Issues (Seattle, WA) Neel Chauhan
BGP hujack by AS25478? Hank Nussbacher
Re: BGP hujack by AS25478? Aftab Siddiqui

Tuesday, 09 November

Re: BGP hujack by AS25478? Lou D
What’s up with Comcast in Philadelphia area Justin Keller
Re: What’s up with Comcast in Philadelphia area Jason Canady
Re: What’s up with Comcast in Philadelphia area Mel Beckman
Re: BGP hujack by AS25478? John Neiberger

Wednesday, 10 November

GeoLocation contact for HBO? Mike Lyon

Thursday, 11 November

DNS hijack? Jeff Shultz
Re: DNS hijack? Jeff Shultz
Re: DNS hijack? Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: DNS hijack? Jeff Shultz

Friday, 12 November

Re: DNS hijack? Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: DNS hijack? William Herrin
Re: DNS hijack? Matthew Petach
Geolocation for Disney Plus Drew Weaver
Validating multi-path in production? Adam Thompson
Re: DNS hijack? Jeff Shultz
Re: DNS hijack? Richard
Re: Geolocation for Disney Plus Dave Bell
Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
Re: Geolocation for Disney Plus Norman Jester
Re: Geolocation for Disney Plus Jim Troutman
RE: Geolocation for Disney Plus Kevin McCormick
Re: DNS hijack? Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: DNS hijack? Jeff Shultz
Re: Questions about IRR best practices Adam Korab
Re: Validating multi-path in production? Jeff Tantsura
Re: DNS hijack? Jim
Re: DNS hijack? Rubens Kuhl
Re: DNS hijack? William Herrin
Re: DNS hijack? Robert L Mathews
Re: Questions about IRR best practices Jay Hennigan
Re: Questions about IRR best practices George Michaelson
Re: Questions about IRR best practices Rubens Kuhl
Re: Questions about IRR best practices George Michaelson
Re: Questions about IRR best practices Adam Korab

Saturday, 13 November

Re: Validating multi-path in production? Saku Ytti
Re: DNS hijack? Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: DNS hijack? Nick Hilliard
Re: DNS hijack? Jim
Re: Questions about IRR best practices Randy Bush

Sunday, 14 November

Re: Validating multi-path in production? James Bensley
Re: Validating multi-path in production? Adam Thompson
Re: Validating multi-path in production? Martijn Schmidt via NANOG
Netflix GeoIP location support Mike Lyon

Monday, 15 November

Re: Validating multi-path in production? Tom Beecher
strange scam? email claiming to be from the fbi Glenn McGurrin via NANOG
Re: strange scam? email claiming to be from the fbi Bill Woodcock
Re: strange scam? email claiming to be from the fbi Christopher Morrow
Re: strange scam? email claiming to be from the fbi Richard
Re: strange scam? email claiming to be from the fbi Jay Hennigan
Re: strange scam? email claiming to be from the fbi Sander Steffann
Fwd: [APRICOT-PC-Chairs] APRICOT 2022 Call for Presentations Mark Tinka

Tuesday, 16 November

Re: strange scam? email claiming to be from the fbi Glenn McGurrin via NANOG
Re: strange scam? email claiming to be from the fbi Michael Wayne

Wednesday, 17 November

Reminder to Submit Presentations for NANOG 84 Cat Gurinsky
Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public scott
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Mark Andrews
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Matt Palmer
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Matt Palmer
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Sean Donelan
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Mark Andrews
FERC releases final report on Texas power outages (2021) Sean Donelan
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public John Levine
FERC: 2021 Lessons Learned from Commission-Led CIP Reliability Audits (October 2021) Sean Donelan
RE: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jerry Cloe
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Mark Tinka
Re: FERC releases final report on Texas power outages (2021) Haudy Kazemi via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Mark Andrews

Thursday, 18 November

Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public borg
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Greg Skinner via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Carsten Bormann
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Nick Hilliard
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Masataka Ohta
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public John Curran
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public jim deleskie
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Steven Bakker
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Dave Taht
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Justin Keller
Re: FERC releases final report on Texas power outages (2021) Andy Ringsmuth
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jonathan Kalbfeld via NANOG
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public John R. Levine
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public David Conrad
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public John Kristoff
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jay R. Ashworth
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin
Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast John Gilmore
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Justin Streiner
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Fred Baker
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Nick Hilliard
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast John Gilmore
VIDEO | WATCH NANOG 83 Keynotes + More Nanog News
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Randy Bush
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Joe Maimon
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Karsten Thomann via NANOG
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jim
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public bzs
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Sean Donelan
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast John Gilmore
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast bzs
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast David Conrad
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast John Gilmore
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Fred Baker
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast David Conrad
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast David Conrad
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Måns Nilsson
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin

Friday, 19 November

Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Masataka Ohta
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Nick Hilliard
OpenDNS contact Mark Costlow
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Jared Mauch
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Joe Maimon
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: FERC releases final report on Texas power outages (2021) Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Nick Hilliard
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Joe Provo
Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Joe Maimon
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Randy Bush
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin
Re: FERC releases final report on Texas power outages (2021) Tom Beecher
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Michael Thomas
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jay R. Ashworth
Re: OpenDNS contact Chris Murray
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Michael Thomas
Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Greg Skinner via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Dave Taht
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Dave Taht
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Zu
Re: OpenDNS contact Joel Esler via NANOG
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast William Herrin
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast John Curran
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast William Herrin
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast William Herrin
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Joe Maimon
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Michael Thomas
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast John Gilmore
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Jim
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast John Gilmore
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public John Gilmore
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast John Gilmore
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast John Gilmore
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Måns Nilsson
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying John Levine
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Michael Thomas
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Tom Beecher
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Måns Nilsson
Re: FERC releases final report on Texas power outages (2021) Haudy Kazemi via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Masataka Ohta
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying John Levine
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying John Lee

Saturday, 20 November

Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Måns Nilsson
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Matthew Walster
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Masataka Ohta
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Måns Nilsson
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Mark Tinka
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Måns Nilsson
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Masataka Ohta
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Chris Adams
Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Michael Thomas
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jim
Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jay Hennigan
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public John Levine
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Michael Thomas
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Michael Thomas
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Michael Thomas
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Matthew Walster
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Enno Rey
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Måns Nilsson
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Måns Nilsson
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Gaurav Kansal
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Gaurav Kansal
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Matthew Walster
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Matthew Walster
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast ML
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public james.cutler () consultant com
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Mark Andrews
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Joe Maimon
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Unicast etc meta-observation bzs
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Max Harmony via NANOG
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Jay Hennigan
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Joe Maimon
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Saku Ytti

Sunday, 21 November

Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Eliot Lear
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Matthew Petach
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Eliot Lear
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast J. Hellenthal via NANOG
RE: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Richard Irving
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Måns Nilsson
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Måns Nilsson
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Michael Thomas
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin
Quantifying the customer support and impact of cgnat for residential ipv4 Eric Kuhnke
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast bzs
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG
RE: Quantifying the customer support and impact of cgnat for residential ipv4 Travis Garrison
RE: Quantifying the customer support and impact of cgnat for residential ipv4 aaron1

Monday, 22 November

FreeBSD users of 127/8 John Gilmore
Re: Class E addresses? 240/4 history John Gilmore
Re: Class E addresses? 240/4 history Eliot Lear
RPKI-Based Policy Without Route Refresh Mark Tinka
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta
RE: Quantifying the customer support and impact of cgnat for residential ipv4 Graham Johnston
Re: FreeBSD users of 127/8 Måns Nilsson
Your opinion on security and privacy implication of CDN - a 2min survey Rui Xin
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Greg Skinner via NANOG
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Lincoln Dale
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG

Tuesday, 23 November

Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Eliot Lear
multihoming Dave Taht
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Francis Booth via NANOG
Google location question Chuck Church
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: fun with TLDs and captive portals was, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public John Levine
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying j k
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public David Conrad
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin
Re: Google location question Hank Nussbacher
Re: multihoming Masataka Ohta
Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta

Wednesday, 24 November

Re: multihoming Baldur Norddahl
Re: multihoming Saku Ytti
anyone use fbtracert successfully? Adam Thompson
Re: anyone use fbtracert successfully? Thomas Scott
Re: anyone use fbtracert successfully? Thomas Scott
Salesforce issues Erik Sundberg
Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow
SentryPeer: A distributed peer to peer list of bad IP addresses and phone numbers collected via a SIP Honeypot Gavin Henry
Re: multihoming Geoff Huston
Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public David Conrad
Re: SentryPeer: A distributed peer to peer list of bad IP addresses and phone numbers collected via a SIP Honeypot Eric Kuhnke
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin
Re: multihoming Masataka Ohta via NANOG
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Denis Fondras

Thursday, 25 November

Re: Salesforce issues Niels Bakker
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Jared Mauch
Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Dave Taht
Re: anyone use fbtracert successfully? Hugo Slabbert
traceroute with load? Dave Taht
RE: anyone use fbtracert successfully? Adam Thompson
RE: anyone use fbtracert successfully? Jean St-Laurent via NANOG
Re: multihoming Bjørn Mork
Re: multihoming Michael Thomas

Friday, 26 November

Re: Validating multi-path in production? Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: SentryPeer: A distributed peer to peer list of bad IP addresses and phone numbers collected via a SIP Honeypot Gavin Henry
RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Frank Habicht
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Jose Luis Rodriguez
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mike Hammett
Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
Re: SentryPeer: A distributed peer to peer list of bad IP addresses and phone numbers collected via a SIP Honeypot Max Tulyev
Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Colin Legendre
RE: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Tony Wicks
Re: SentryPeer: A distributed peer to peer list of bad IP addresses and phone numbers collected via a SIP Honeypot Gavin Henry
RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG
RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Ca By
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas
Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Fiona Weber via NANOG
RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas
RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Fred Baker

Saturday, 27 November

Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Saku Ytti
RE: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Tony Wicks
Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Saku Ytti
Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Tassos
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Scott Morizot
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Gary Buhrmaster
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle
Re: IPv6 and CDN's William Herrin
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas
Re: multihoming Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Grzegorz Janoszka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG
AWS and IPv6 Fletcher Kittredge
Looking for a contact at Citi Ed Ronayne
problem with cloud services at Lightshot / app.prntscr.com. Jacques G. Busnardo
RE: IPv6 and CDN's JCLB
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Christopher Morrow
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Fred Baker
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta

Sunday, 28 November

Re: SentryPeer: A distributed peer to peer list of bad IP addresses and phone numbers collected via a SIP Honeypot Gavin Henry
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Baldur Norddahl
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta
RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's sronan
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Colin Legendre
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: AWS and IPv6 Michael Thomas
Re: AWS and IPv6 Karl Auer
Re: AWS and IPv6 Dave Bell
Re: AWS and IPv6 Michael Thomas
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Dave Bell
Re: IPv6 and CDN's William Herrin
Re: AWS and IPv6 William Herrin
Re: IPv6 and CDN's scott
Re: AWS and IPv6 Oliver O'Boyle
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Dave Taht
Re: AWS and IPv6 Matt Palmer
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Andrews
Re: AWS and IPv6 Michael Thomas
Re: AWS and IPv6 William Herrin
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta
Re: AWS and IPv6 William Herrin
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta

Monday, 29 November

Re: IPv6 and CDN's Baldur Norddahl
RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG
Theorical question about cyclic dependency in IRR filtering Anurag Bhatia
Re: Theorical question about cyclic dependency in IRR filtering Job Snijders via NANOG
Re: Theorical question about cyclic dependency in IRR filtering Christopher Morrow
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Greg Skinner via NANOG
Re: Theorical question about cyclic dependency in IRR filtering J. Hellenthal via NANOG

Tuesday, 30 November

Re: Theorical question about cyclic dependency in IRR filtering Ben Maddison via NANOG
Re: Theorical question about cyclic dependency in IRR filtering Christopher Morrow
private 5G networks? Michael Thomas
Re: private 5G networks? Shane Ronan
Re: private 5G networks? Michael Thomas
Re: private 5G networks? Josh Luthman
Re: private 5G networks? Josh Luthman
Re: private 5G networks? Shane Ronan
Re: private 5G networks? Shane Ronan
Re: private 5G networks? Michael Thomas
Re: private 5G networks? Tom Beecher
Re: private 5G networks? Shane Ronan
Re: private 5G networks? Michael Thomas
Re: private 5G networks? Shane Ronan
Re: private 5G networks? Baldur Norddahl
Re: private 5G networks? Tom Beecher
Re: private 5G networks? Anthony
Re: private 5G networks? Baldur Norddahl
Re: private 5G networks? Shane Ronan
Re: private 5G networks? Shane Ronan
Re: private 5G networks? James Jun
Re: private 5G networks? sronan
Re: private 5G networks? John Gilmore
Re: private 5G networks? Shane Ronan

Previous period

Next period