nanog mailing list archives
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 20:03:47 -0500 (EST)
Time comes at you fast :-)The POSIX committee has officially adopted 64-bit time_t as a requirement in the working draft of IEEE Std. 1003.1-202x and ISO/IEC 9945.
One thing to cross off my list. And I was looking forward to all the time machines crashing into the University of California Berkeley quad on
03:14:07 UTC on 19 January 2038. On Wed, 17 Nov 2021, Sean Donelan wrote:
Other problems which will occur sooner: 1. Unix 32-bit time_t overflow. 2. North American Numbering Plan runs out of +1 zone phone numbers 3. IPv6 deployed and working everywhere/everything on the Internet 4. Analog AM and FM radio broadcasting deprecated (see digital DAB/DRM/HD) 5. Heat death of the universe
Current thread:
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public, (continued)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 21)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Dave Taht (Nov 19)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Matt Palmer (Nov 17)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin (Nov 17)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 19)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Matt Palmer (Nov 17)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Sean Donelan (Nov 17)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Sean Donelan (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- RE: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jerry Cloe (Nov 17)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Gaurav Kansal (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Mark Tinka (Nov 17)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public borg (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Mark Tinka (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Greg Skinner via NANOG (Nov 18)