Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

[John Curran <jcurran () istaff org>]

On 17 Nov 2021, at 6:29 PM, Jay R. Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:
> This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who noticed?
>
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html


Workgroup:
Internet Engineering Task Force
Internet-Draft:
draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00
Updates:
1122 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1122>, 1812 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1812>, 2827 
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2827>, 3704 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3704> (if approved)
Published:
8 November 2021






Perhaps it was just submitted 144 days too earlier and thus was miscategorized?
;-) 
/John

Disclaimer(s): my views alone.  Contains 100% recycled electrons.