Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

[Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>]

Mans Nilsson wrote:

Supplying context you omit:

>>> No, it is the real reason that we still have v4 around.

>> Even more than 25 years after IPv6 became a proposed standard?
> > It merely means IPv6 is not deployable with the real reason.

> IPv6 is deployable. It is deployed.

If you mean ATM is deployable and was deployed, yes, you are
right. So?

>> After finding that, I, as a theorist, totally abandoned IPv6.
> You gave up, based on false conclusions.

Sorry, but I'm not interested in how you falsely recognize the
real world of practical and theoretical internetworking.

                                                Masataka Ohta