nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:11:41 -0500
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 6:07 PM Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote:
On 11/26/21 1:44 PM, Jean St-Laurent via NANOG wrote: Here are some maths and 1 argument kicking ass pitch for CFO’s that use iphones. *Apple tells app devs to use IPv6 as it's 1.4 times faster than IPv4* https://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-tells-app-devs-to-use-ipv6-as-its-1-4-times-faster-than-ipv4/ Build around that maybe? This really hits my bs meter big time. I can't see how nat'ing is going to cause a 40% performance hit during connections. The article also mentions http2 (and later v3) which definitely make big improvements so I'm suspecting that the author is conflating them. Mike
Ok, take the same ipv6 is faster claim from facebook https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2015/04/facebook-news-feeds-load-20-40-faster-over-ipv6/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Max Tulyev (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Jose Luis Rodriguez (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mike Hammett (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Ca By (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Scott Morizot (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 27)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 26)