nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 13:43:22 +0900
Fred Baker wrote:
Because lengthy IPv6 addresses mean a lot more opex than IPv4.I disagreeTry to type in raw IPv6 addresses.People are likely to use a technology originally developed because > IPv4 had the same perception problem: DNS.
Here in nanog, we are talking about network operations, considerable part of which can not rely on DNS. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Christopher Morrow (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Fred Baker (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's sronan (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)