nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Frank Habicht <geier () geier ne tz>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:47:21 +0300
On 26/11/2021 13:52, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 11/3/21 22:13, Max Tulyev wrote:Implementing IPv6 reduces costs for CGNAT. You will have (twice?) less traffic flow through CGNAT, so cheaper hardware and less IPv4 address space. Isn't it?How to express that in numbers CFO can take to the bank?
"want to buy 5 of those shiny new CGNAT boxes or only 2 ?" Frank
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 29)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)