nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 and CDN's
From: JCLB <JC () JCLB NET>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 23:26:40 +0000
Might also be due to Happy Eyeballs 2 artificial IPv4 A resolution delay. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343467289_Reducing_User_Perceived_Latency_in_Smart_Phones_Exploiting_IP_Network_Diversity/fulltext/5f2b6bdaa6fdcccc43ac7b99/Reducing-User-Perceived-Latency-in-Smart-Phones-Exploiting-IP-Network-Diversity.pdf I don’t know the current Apple IOS HE2 postpone delay. JC Bisecco De : NANOG <nanog-bounces+jc=jclb.net () nanog org> De la part de Michael Thomas Envoyé : samedi 27 novembre 2021 00:20 À : Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> Cc : nanog () nanog org Objet : Re: IPv6 and CDN's On 11/26/21 3:11 PM, Ca By wrote: On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 6:07 PM Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com<mailto:mike () mtcc com>> wrote: On 11/26/21 1:44 PM, Jean St-Laurent via NANOG wrote: Here are some maths and 1 argument kicking ass pitch for CFO’s that use iphones. Apple tells app devs to use IPv6 as it's 1.4 times faster than IPv4 https://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-tells-app-devs-to-use-ipv6-as-its-1-4-times-faster-than-ipv4/ Build around that maybe? This really hits my bs meter big time. I can't see how nat'ing is going to cause a 40% performance hit during connections. The article also mentions http2 (and later v3) which definitely make big improvements so I'm suspecting that the author is conflating them. Mike Ok, take the same ipv6 is faster claim from facebook https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2015/04/facebook-news-feeds-load-20-40-faster-over-ipv6/ Still really thin with details of why. At least this says that they are NAT'ing v4 at *their* edge. But 99% of the lag of filling your newsfeed is their backend and transport, not connection times so who knows what they are actually measuring. Most NAT'ing is done at the consumer end by your home router in any case. Mike
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Gary Buhrmaster (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's JCLB (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's William Herrin (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Dave Taht (Nov 28)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Grzegorz Janoszka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Christopher Morrow (Nov 27)