nanog mailing list archives

Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

From: Carsten Bormann <cabo () tzi org>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:15:39 +0100

On 2021-11-18, at 00:29, Jay R. Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:


This seems like a really bad idea


Right up there with the FUSSP.

https://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html

Someone should write a page like that about the FUSIAS (final ultimate solution to the IPv4 address shortage) proposals.

Grüße, Carsten

Current thread:

Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public, (continued)
- - Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- RE: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jerry Cloe (Nov 17)
  - Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
  - Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Gaurav Kansal (Nov 20)
    - Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Mark Tinka (Nov 17)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public borg (Nov 18)
  - Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
  - Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Mark Tinka (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Greg Skinner via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Carsten Bormann (Nov 18)
  - Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public bzs (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Masataka Ohta (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public John Curran (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public jim deleskie (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Justin Keller (Nov 18)
  - Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 18)
    - Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin (Nov 18)
    - Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Fred Baker (Nov 18)
    - Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon (Nov 18)
    - Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin (Nov 18)

(Thread continues...)