nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 16:05:47 +0200
On 11/26/21 23:47, Jean St-Laurent via NANOG wrote:
With that specific line directly from Apple:"And when IPv6 is in use, the median connection setup is 1.4 times faster than IPv4. This is primarily due to reduced NAT usage and improved routing."There it is, Improved routing.
Perhaps you mean "improved forwarding".In an environment that is heavily peered, what is the visual difference in experience for a customer connecting to a site at 1ms vs. 1.4ms?
Across the sea, assume 140ms between Cape Town - London (Omicron, anyone?), what is the visual difference between 140ms vs. 196ms? Okay, bad example, but I can probably get an MS-MPC from Juniper that can claw back 1.3X of that 1.4X advantage :-). Besides, locally-peered traffic is likely to exceed long-haul traffic, in many markets.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's JCLB (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's William Herrin (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Dave Taht (Nov 28)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Grzegorz Janoszka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Christopher Morrow (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)