nanog mailing list archives

Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public


From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 06:54:10 +0200



On 11/18/21 01:29, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:

This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who noticed?

https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html

That's over a week old and I don't see 3000 comments on it, so maybe it's just
me.  So many things are just me.

There is a better chance of writing a successful RFC to clean up "cisco, cisco" for user/pass on Google.

Mark.


Current thread: