nanog mailing list archives
Re: multihoming
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:06:39 -0800
On 11/25/21 11:54 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> writes:Also, for completeness, MP-TCP clearly does not help UDP or ICMP flows... nor IPSEC nor GRE nor... unless you HTTP over MP-TCP and encap UDP/ICMP/GRE/IPSEC over that!IP over DNS has been a thing forever. IP over DoH should work just fine.Talk about layer violations! talk about fun!Yes, fun...
Feh. I've written transistors over http. Beat that. Mike
Current thread:
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying, (continued)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 23)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
- multihoming Dave Taht (Nov 23)
- Re: multihoming Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
- Re: multihoming Baldur Norddahl (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Saku Ytti (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Geoff Huston (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Bjørn Mork (Nov 25)
- Re: multihoming Michael Thomas (Nov 25)
- Re: multihoming Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: multihoming Masataka Ohta via NANOG (Nov 24)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 21)
- Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Eliot Lear (Nov 21)
- Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Lincoln Dale (Nov 22)
- Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Dave Taht (Nov 18)
- Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon (Nov 18)
- Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: WKBI #586, Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Joe Maimon (Nov 19)
- Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast John Gilmore (Nov 19)