nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS hijack?
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 20:27:39 +0100
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 09:44:04PM +0000, Richard <lists-nanog () listmail innovate net> wrote a message of 37 lines which said:
The second of these is returning the 208.nnn IPnumber for your a-record: dig @VOYAGER.VISER.NET 2dpnr.org 2dpnr.org. 300 IN A 208.91.197.132
It depends on where you are (from my resolver, I get 64.130.197.11). This is because the name voyager.viser.net is not stable yet. Depending on your resolver, it points to 64.130.200.16 - which seems to give correct answers - or to 208.91.197.132 - which replies even for nonexisting domain names. Lesson: don't use a name as an argument to dig's @
Current thread:
- Re: DNS hijack?, (continued)
- Re: DNS hijack? Jeff Shultz (Nov 11)
- Re: DNS hijack? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Nov 12)
- Re: DNS hijack? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Nov 11)
- Re: DNS hijack? Jeff Shultz (Nov 11)
- Re: DNS hijack? William Herrin (Nov 12)
- Re: DNS hijack? Matthew Petach (Nov 12)
- Re: DNS hijack? Jeff Shultz (Nov 12)
- Re: DNS hijack? Robert L Mathews (Nov 12)
- Re: DNS hijack? Jim (Nov 13)
- Re: DNS hijack? Jeff Shultz (Nov 11)
- Re: DNS hijack? Jeff Shultz (Nov 11)
- Re: DNS hijack? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Nov 12)
- Re: DNS hijack? Jeff Shultz (Nov 12)
- Re: DNS hijack? Jim (Nov 12)
- Re: DNS hijack? Rubens Kuhl (Nov 12)
- Re: DNS hijack? William Herrin (Nov 12)
- Re: DNS hijack? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Nov 13)
- Re: DNS hijack? Nick Hilliard (Nov 13)