nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Jean St-Laurent via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 07:09:28 -0500
Ipv6 can be shorter than ipv4. Here is the proof: ping6 ::1 is shorter than ping 127.1 ipv6 addresses can be very small when done properly. Jean -----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+jean=ddostest.me () nanog org> On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: November 28, 2021 5:39 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: IPv6 and CDN's On 11/28/21 05:37, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Try to type in raw IPv6 addresses.
There is DNS for that. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 29)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Dave Bell (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's William Herrin (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 29)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)