nanog mailing list archives
Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
From: Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 06:58:34 -0800
Can you be more specific about what changes to IPv6 you believe would resolve the issue? Owen
On Nov 18, 2021, at 01:43 , borg () uu3 net wrote: No, you are not alone. This just gets kinda pathetic. It also shows how an IPv6 is a failure. (No please, leave me alone all you IPv6 zealots). I think its time to go back to design board and start working on IPv8 ;) so we finnaly get rid of IPv4... ---------- Original message ---------- From: Jay R. Ashworth <jra () baylink com> To: nanog <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 23:29:49 +0000 (UTC) This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who noticed? https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html That's over a week old and I don't see 3000 comments on it, so maybe it's just me. So many things are just me. [ Hat tip to Lauren Weinstein, whom I stole it from ] Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
Current thread:
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public, (continued)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Matt Palmer (Nov 17)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Sean Donelan (Nov 17)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Sean Donelan (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- RE: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jerry Cloe (Nov 17)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Gaurav Kansal (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Mark Tinka (Nov 17)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public borg (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 19)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Mark Tinka (Nov 20)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Greg Skinner via NANOG (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Carsten Bormann (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public bzs (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Masataka Ohta (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public John Curran (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public jim deleskie (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Justin Keller (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public William Herrin (Nov 18)
- Re: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 18)
(Thread continues...)