Re: Class D addresses? was: Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

[William Herrin <bill () herrin us>]

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 5:03 AM Eliot Lear <lear () ofcourseimright com> wrote:
> So what's the road to actually being able to use [240/4]?

1. Move it from "reserved" to "unallocated unicast" (IETF action)
2. Wait 10 years
3. Now that nearly all equipment that didn't treat it as
yet-to-be-allocated unicast has cycled out of use, argue about what to
allocate the addresses to for best effect.


Similar plan for 0/8, 255/8 and 127/8-127.0/16:

1. Move from their existing status to "deprecated former use;
unallocated unicast."
2. Wait 10 years.
3. Now that most equipment that didn't treat it as yet-to-be-allocated
unicast has cycled out of use, argue about what to allocate the
addresses to.


Bottom line though is that the IETF has to act before anyone else
reasonably can.

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William Herrin
bill () herrin us
https://bill.herrin.us/