nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:55:59 -0600 (CST)
Care to explain because the alternative seems pretty self-evident. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jose Luis Rodriguez" <jlrodriguez () gmail com> To: "Jean St-Laurent" <jean () ddostest me> Cc: nanog () nanog org Sent: Friday, November 26, 2021 8:16:53 AM Subject: Re: IPv6 and CDN's Well … YMMV. We’ve been running v6 for years, and it didn’t really make a dent in spend or boxes or rate of v4 depletion. Big part of the problem in our neck of the woods is millions of v4-only terminals … as well as large customer/gov bids requiring tons of v4 address space.
On Nov 26, 2021, at 07:04, Jean St-Laurent via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote: With a kicking ass pitch -----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+jean=ddostest.me () nanog org> On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: November 26, 2021 5:52 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: IPv6 and CDN'sOn 11/3/21 22:13, Max Tulyev wrote: Implementing IPv6 reduces costs for CGNAT. You will have (twice?) less traffic flow through CGNAT, so cheaper hardware and less IPv4 address space. Isn't it?How to express that in numbers CFO can take to the bank? Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Max Tulyev (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Jose Luis Rodriguez (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mike Hammett (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Ca By (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 26)