nanog mailing list archives
RE: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006
From: "Tony Wicks" <tony () wicks co nz>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:31:59 +1300
I mean a router without ASIC based forwarding like a Juniper MX or Nokia 7750. The advantage of the 1k is you don't need a services card for cgnat, but the large disadvantage is everything passes through the ESP processor and this often leads to disappointing results under load.
I'm not sure what a CPU based box means here. ASR1k isn't using a general purpose core like PQ3, INTC or AMD. Like CRS-1 and nPower, ASR1k has Cisco made forwarding logic using cores from tensilica (CPP10/popey I believe was 40 x Tensilica DI 570T, next iteration was
64 cores). -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Colin Legendre (Nov 26)
- RE: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Tony Wicks (Nov 26)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Saku Ytti (Nov 27)
- RE: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Tony Wicks (Nov 27)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Saku Ytti (Nov 27)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Saku Ytti (Nov 27)
- RE: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Tony Wicks (Nov 26)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Fiona Weber via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Tassos (Nov 27)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Colin Legendre (Nov 28)
- Re: Latency/Packet Loss on ASR1006 Tassos (Nov 27)