nanog: by date

1097 messages starting Aug 01 02 and ending Feb 04 23
Date index | Thread index | Author index

Thursday, 01 August

FCC on UUNET .. Robert Mathews
OpenSSH Trojan.. Len Rose
Re: Identifying DoS sources quickly (was: Bogon list or Dshield.org type list) Rafi Sadowsky
RE: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk jnull
Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Gerardo A. Gregory
Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Gerardo A. Gregory
RE: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Mike Lewinski
Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Jeffrey Meltzer
Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Kevin Loch
Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Valdis . Kletnieks
RE:tisk tisk--retract jnull
Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Christopher L. Morrow
Re: Identifying DoS sources quickly (was: Bogon list or Dshield.org type list) Jesper Skriver
Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Stephen Stuart
Re: RE:tisk tisk--retract Mike Forrester
Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Stephen Stuart
Bonding ATM circuits for DSL Christopher J. Wolff
RE: Bonding ATM circuits for DSL Christopher J. Wolff
Pacific Bell Frame Cloud problem in the San Francisco Area Ulf Zimmermann
RE: Bonding ATM circuits for DSL Martin, Christian
Re: OpenSSH Trojan=tisk tisk Brad Knowles
Re: Pacific Bell Frame Cloud problem in the San Francisco Area Ulf Zimmermann
Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Peter van Dijk
Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Scott Granados

Friday, 02 August

ATT Fire in Philly? blitz
cw outage? Dan Hollis
Re: cw outage? Pawlukiewicz Jane
cw Scott Granados
Re: cw outage? Mike Lewinski
Re: cw outage? Rich Fulton
RE: cw outage? Stanley, Jon
RE: cw outage? Dan Hollis
RE: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Lane Patterson
The Cidr Report CIDR Report
Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Nipper, Arnold
Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Stephen Stuart

Saturday, 03 August

Cisco fixup for SMTP (Mail Guard) Shaun Bryant
If you have nothing to hide Sean Donelan
Re: Cisco fixup for SMTP (Mail Guard) Brad Knowles
Re: Cisco fixup for SMTP (Mail Guard) Stephen Sprunk
Re: If you have nothing to hide Paul Vixie

Sunday, 04 August

Re: If you have nothing to hide Sean Donelan
NSPs filter? Abdullah Bin Hamad - Arabian
Re: NSPs filter? bmanning
Re: NSPs filter? Christopher L. Morrow
Re: If you have nothing to hide Dave Crocker
Re: If you have nothing to hide Sean Donelan
Contacting Richard Clarke, Special Advisor to the President for Cyberspace Security Sean Donelan
Re: NSPs filter? Chris Woodfield
Re: NSPs filter? bmanning
Re: NSPs filter? Stephen Stuart
Re: NSPs filter? sal_sabella
Re: NSPs filter? Stephen Stuart
Re: If you have nothing to hide Dave Crocker

Monday, 05 August

Re: If you have nothing to hide Simon Waters
Re: If you have nothing to hide fingers
Re: If you have nothing to hide bmanning
Re: If you have nothing to hide Len Rose
Re: NSPs filter? Chris Woodfield
Re: If you have nothing to hide bdragon
Re: If you have nothing to hide Len Rose
Re: NSPs filter? Jared Mauch
Re: NSPs filter? Richard A Steenbergen
Re: If you have nothing to hide Stephen Sprunk
Re: If you have nothing to hide Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: If you have nothing to hide bdragon
RE: NSPs filter? Barry Raveendran Greene
Re: NSPs filter? bdragon
Re[2]: If you have nothing to hide Richard Welty
Re: If you have nothing to hide bdragon
Re: NSPs filter? Richard A Steenbergen
C&W Direction James Ferris
Verizon experiencing routing issues? Darrell Carley
Re: Verizon experiencing routing issues? Mark Kent
Re: Verizon experiencing routing issues? David Lesher
Re: NSPs filter? Richard A Steenbergen
Re: Verizon experiencing routing issues? Darrell Carley
Re: Verizon experiencing routing issues? Richard A Steenbergen
Re: Verizon experiencing routing issues? Tony Tauber
Re: If you have nothing to hide Jeffrey Haas
RE: NSPs filter? Hank Nussbacher
Re: Re[2]: If you have nothing to hide Miquel van Smoorenburg
Re: NSPs filter? Chris Woodfield
BBC-2 Story on Sept.11 Alan Sawyer
Re: If you have nothing to hide Gerardo A. Gregory
Re: If you have nothing to hide Scott Weeks
Re: NSPs filter? Jared Mauch
Re: If you have nothing to hide Eric Osborne
Re: NSPs filter? John M. Brown
Re: NSPs filter? John M. Brown
Re: NSPs filter? John M. Brown
Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal
Re: If you have nothing to hide bdragon
Re: If you have nothing to hide bdragon
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Richard A Steenbergen
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Simon Lockhart
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Stephen J. Wilcox
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal
Re[4]: If you have nothing to hide Richard Welty
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bmanning
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes John M. Brown
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal
Re: NSPs filter? Scott Granados
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes jnull
Re: If you have nothing to hide Eric Osborne
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes john
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes John M. Brown
Re: If you have nothing to hide Henry Yen

Tuesday, 06 August

Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali
Re: BBC-2 Story on Sept.11 cw
Re: BBC-2 Story on Sept.11 Rob Pickering
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Ratul Mahajan
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes E.B. Dreger
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bmanning
U.S. monitoring Internet attacks (fwd) Christopher X. Candreva
RE: U.S. monitoring Internet attacks (fwd) Al Rowland
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Jared Mauch
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes nanog
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes E.B. Dreger
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Dominic J. Eidson
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes E.B. Dreger
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Derek Samford
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal
Re: U.S. monitoring Internet attacks (fwd) Len Rose
NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds Sean Donelan
Re: GBLX router upgrade breaks bgp sessions bdragon
Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds Sean Donelan
Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds William Warren
Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds Pawlukiewicz Jane
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes E.B. Dreger
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Daniel Senie
Re: GBLX router upgrade breaks bgp sessions nanog
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Jeff S Wheeler
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Derek Samford
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Simon Lockhart
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bmanning
Re: U.S. monitoring Internet attacks / RFF Reply Richard Forno
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Adam Rothschild
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Richard A Steenbergen
Re: U.S. monitoring Internet attacks / RFF Reply blitz
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Greg Maxwell
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bdragon
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali
Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds Martin Hannigan
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bmanning
Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds (fwd) David Lesher
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Brad Knowles
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Brad Knowles
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes David Conrad
Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds (fwd) Martin Hannigan
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Brad Knowles
Any issues with AADS Chicago NAP? Matthew Sweet
Re: U.S. monitoring Internet attacks / RFF Reply Scott Granados
Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds (fwd) Scott Granados
Re: NYT: Phone Network Is Vulnerable, Report Finds (fwd) Martin Hannigan
Re: If you have nothing to hide Sean Donelan
Net attacks on CNN Martin Hannigan
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes John M. Brown
RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Alex Rubenstein
Re: Net attacks on CNN Sean Donelan

Wednesday, 07 August

Re: DNS monitoring changes bert hubert
e-mail problems William Warren
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Chris Woodfield
69/8 allocated to ARIN Rob Thomas
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Derek Samford
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Valdis . Kletnieks
DDoS FUD Omachonu Ogali
Re: e-mail problems up
Re: e-mail problems William Warren
RE: e-mail problems Derek Samford
my sig William Warren
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal
Re: my sig Dominic J. Eidson
Re: my sig brett watson
Re: my sig David Klindt
Re: my sig Christian Liendo
Re: my sig Omachonu Ogali
Re: Re: NSPs filter? sal_sabella
RE: my sig Al Rowland
Re: my sig sal_sabella
Re: If you have nothing to hide Steven M. Bellovin
Re: my sig jnull
Re: my sig Omachonu Ogali
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes ril_phosenthal
Re[2]: my sig Richard Welty
"... I don't think that means what he thinks it means..." bmanning
Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Brad Knowles
Re: e-mail problems Scott Granados
[SOT] RIP: Edsger Wybe Dijkstra (fwd) Alif The Terrible
Re: my sig Scott Granados
signature William Warren
Re: my sig Scott Granados
Re: my sig Scott Granados
Re: signature Scott Granados
Re: signature Brad Knowles
Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? William B. Norton
operational context? Re: signature Jim Mercer
Re: routing table size k claffy
Re: operational context? Re: signature Scott Granados
Re: NSPs filter? Stephen Stuart
Re: routing table size David G. Andersen
Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie
Re: RFC 2870's applicability Ralph Doncaster
[no subject] dalph
Re: RFC 2870's applicability Paul Vixie
Network inventory and configuration tracking tools Sean Donelan
Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Patrick
ticket tracking Scott Granados
Re: your mail Brian Wallingford
Re: Network inventory and configuration tracking tools Hugh Irvine
Re: signature Martin Hannigan

Thursday, 08 August

Re: Network inventory and configuration tracking tools jnull
Re: RFC 2870's applicability John M. Brown
NANOG, its decline in s/n John M. Brown
Re: ticket tracking Avleen Vig
Re: ticket tracking gg
Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Brian Wallingford
Re: ticket tracking (off-topic reply) gg
Re: ticket tracking (off-topic reply) Avleen Vig
Re: ticket tracking Niels Bakker
Re: ticket tracking Mike Tancsa
RE: Network inventory and configuration tracking tools Rishi Singh
Re: ticket tracking Andy Dills
Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n David Diaz
RE: NANOG, its decline in s/n Derek Samford
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? William B. Norton
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Alex Rubenstein
RE: ticket tracking Daniel Golding
RE: ticket tracking Derek Samford
Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Rob Healey
BGP, How-tos, tips and tricks, training info. crimson
Re: ticket tracking (off-topic reply) Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: my sig Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n David Diaz
Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Randy Bush
Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Andy Dills
Fw: ticket tracking Gerardo A. Gregory
Re: routing table size David G. Andersen
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? michael . dillon
Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n sal_sabella
RE: BGP, How-tos, tips and tricks, training info. Blake Fithen
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Alex Rubenstein
RE: NANOG, its decline in s/n Derek Samford
RE: NANOG, its decline in s/n Andy Dills
RE: BGP, How-tos, tips and tricks, training info. Charles Sprickman
RE: NANOG, its decline in s/n Derek Samford
Re: your mail Ukyo Kuonji
Verizon DSL Contact Erich Kuehn
RE: Network inventory and configuration tracking tools Internet Guy
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? bmanning
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: BGP, How-tos, tips and tricks, training info. Jeffrey Meltzer
well the rt's have it:) Scott Granados
Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Scott Granados
Re: your mail Scott Granados
Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Scott Granados
Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Valdis . Kletnieks
Anyone heard of anything at OC24? Ryan Mooney
[lamour () mail argfrp us uu net: Fwd: Re: If you have nothing to hide] Todd MacDermid
Re: your mail Charles Sprickman
Re: NSPs filter? David Schwartz
Re: NSPs filter? Stephen Stuart
Re: If you have nothing to hide bdragon
BGP evaluation Sathya Perla
Re: BGP evaluation senthil ayyasamy
Re: your mail JC Dill

Friday, 09 August

59% of dweebs suffer from 'False Authority Syndrome (Re: If you have nothing to hide) Len Rose
Re: If you have nothing to hide gg
Re: your mail Chris Adams
Re: Network inventory and configuration tracking tools Streiner, Justin
Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Brad Knowles
Re: Re: Network inventory and configuration tracking tools Frank Coluccio
Re: your mail Pawlukiewicz Jane
Re: your mail Ukyo Kuonji
Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Stephen Sprunk
Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Randy Bush
Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie
Re: your mail Joel Baker
Re: your mail Alif The Terrible
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Nenad Trifunovic
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Bill Woodcock
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? William B. Norton
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Nenad Trifunovic
Re: your mail Martin Hannigan
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Petri Helenius
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Mike Leber
endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an ymore?) Lane Patterson
Fwd: WorldCom Fraud News: Man these thieves just don't quit.. blitz
Re: your mail blitz
Re: your mail mike harrison
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Steve Feldman
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Paul Vixie
The Cidr Report CIDR Report

Saturday, 10 August

laissez-faire DNS jnull
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Petri Helenius
Re: endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an ymore?) Vadim Antonov
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Paul Vixie
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Mike Hughes
Re: endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an ymore?) Mike Hughes
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? cowie
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Robert E. Seastrom
Re: endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sensean ymore?) Petri Helenius
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Petri Helenius
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Richard A Steenbergen
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Jared Mauch
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Vadim Antonov
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Alex Rubenstein
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Alex Rubenstein
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Alex Rubenstein
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Richard A Steenbergen

Sunday, 11 August

Responses and update.. Scott Walker
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? David Diaz
Microslosh vision of the future blitz
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Kevin Oberman
damping Randy Bush
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Paul Vixie
Re: Microslosh vision of the future gg
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Alif The Terrible
Re: endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an ymore?) Jesper Skriver
Re: Microslosh vision of the future David Schwartz
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Vadim Antonov
Re: Microslosh vision of the future David Schwartz
Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz
Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz
Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz
Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz
Re: endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an ymore?) Petri Helenius

Monday, 12 August

Re: Microslosh vision of the future David Howe
Re: Microslosh vision of the future William Warren
Re: Microslosh vision of the future William Warren
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Stephen Sprunk
Re: endpoint liveness (RE: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense an ymore?) Stephen Sprunk
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Stephen Sprunk
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Stephen Sprunk
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Gerardo A. Gregory
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Stephen J. Wilcox
Re: your mail JC Dill
gentlemen, stop your engines Paul Vixie
Re: Microslosh vision of the future William Warren
Re: Microslosh vision of the future David Howe
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Gregory Hicks
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Jim Segrave
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Nenad Trifunovic
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Paul Vixie
$400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Sean Donelan
Cisco VPN Client Multiple Vulnerabilities blitz
apologies to the list William Warren
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Brad Knowles
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles
FBI.GOV forgot to pay their DNS bill? Sean Donelan
RE: FBI.GOV forgot to pay their DNS bill? Karyn Ulriksen
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Brad Knowles
Re: Microslosh vision of the future gg
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon gg
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Karsten W. Rohrbach
RE: FBI.GOV forgot to pay their DNS bill? Sean Donelan
Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz
Re: FBI.GOV forgot to pay their DNS bill? blitz
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Alif The Terrible

Tuesday, 13 August

Re: Microslosh vision of the future Eric A. Hall
Palm OS SNMP client... need some input Brian Smith
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Sean Donelan
Routing Protocol Security Jeff Doyle
Re: Routing Protocol Security Danny McPherson
Re: AS path fugliness? Michael Lewinski
Re: Routing Protocol Security senthil ayyasamy
Re: Routing Protocol Security dylan
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles
RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Blake Fithen
RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles
Re: Routing Protocol Security batz
RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Vadim Antonov
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Doug Barton
Re: Routing Protocol Security Hank Nussbacher

Wednesday, 14 August

disa hostmaster
RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Al Rowland
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Curtis Maurand
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon David Lesher
Re: NSPs filter? Måns Nilsson
Best Current Practices for Routing Protocol Security Sean Donelan
E Djikstra Paases Away Martin, Christian
Re: Best Current Practices for Routing Protocol Security John Kristoff
Re: Best Current Practices for Routing Protocol Security dylan
Re: Best Current Practices for Routing Protocol Security Stephen J. Wilcox
RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Scott Granados
RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Daniel Golding
Re: Microslosh vision of the future Karsten W. Rohrbach
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles
RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles
Internet outage reporting databases (was Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon) Sean Donelan
Re: Internet outage reporting databases (was Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon) Aaron Hopkins
RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Scott Granados
Re: Internet outage reporting databases (was Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon) Scott Granados
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon David Lesher
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Scott Granados
Re: Internet outage reporting databases (was Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon) Avleen Vig

Thursday, 15 August

RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Daniel Golding
kudo's to netops security people John M. Brown
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon David Lesher
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Gerald
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? William B. Norton
LISA: sysadmin conference, take 16. Gerald
Re: kudo's to netops security people blitz
ALGX problems? Stanley, Jon
Re: ALGX problems? Chris Parker
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? William B. Norton
Re: ALGX problems? German Martinez
RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon David Schwartz
wcg.com dead? Dan Hollis
Re: wcg.com dead? Richard A Steenbergen
RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles
Re: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles
Re: LISA: sysadmin conference, take 16. Brad Knowles
RE: $400 million network upgrade for the Pentagon Brad Knowles
OT: Seeking John {Johnson, Villasenor, Todd} Jamie Norwood
Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP (WAS Re: ALGX problems?) Joe Wood
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Niels Bakker
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Joe Wood
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP (WAS Re: ALGX problems?) Richard A Steenbergen
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Niels Bakker
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Peter E. Fry
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP (WAS Re: ALGX problems?) Joe Wood
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Joe Wood
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP (WAS Re: ALGX problems?) Mark Kent
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Joe Wood
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Niels Bakker
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Niels Bakker
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP (WAS Re: ALGX problems?) Joe Wood
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Jared Mauch
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Richard A Steenbergen
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Joe Wood
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Jared Mauch
HPOV, Ciscoworks Blake Fithen
Donkey Balls Nathan
Re: Donkey Balls Nathan

Friday, 16 August

Qwest Outage? James Ferris
Re: Qwest Outage? Peter van Dijk
Re: Qwest Outage? James Ferris
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Leo Bicknell
Echo Martin Hannigan
Re: Echo Jeff Wasilko
Re: Echo Martin Hepworth
Re: Echo Martin Hannigan
Re: Max Prefixes Configured on Customer BGP Chris Woodfield
Telus outage in Toronto, Ont Canada (AS852) ? Mike Tancsa
Re: Echo Brad Knowles
Maybe just slightly operational Palladium information Kevin Oberman
Re: Maybe just slightly operational Palladium information blitz
an itty bitty survey... Eliot Lear
Re: an itty bitty survey... mike harrison
Re: Echo Karsten W. Rohrbach
Re: Telus outage in Toronto, Ont Canada (AS852) ? batz
Re: Telus outage in Toronto, Ont Canada (AS852) ? Mike Tancsa
Re: Echo Brad Knowles
Re: Echo Martin Hannigan
Re: Echo Brad Knowles
Re: Echo Brad Knowles
Re: Echo Karsten W. Rohrbach
Re: Echo Karsten W. Rohrbach
Major Labels v. Backbones John Ferriby
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Richard A Steenbergen
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones blitz
Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan
The Cidr Report CIDR Report
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jim Hickstein

Saturday, 17 August

Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones senthil ayyasamy
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Tim Thorne
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean M. Doran
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jeff Ogden
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Paul Vixie
Re: Echo John R. Levine
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Stephen J. Wilcox
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jared Mauch
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Johannes Ullrich
Re: Echo Brad Knowles
Re: Echo Brad Knowles
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Vadim Antonov
Re: Echo Karsten W. Rohrbach
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Ralph Doncaster
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Majdi S. Abbas
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Richard A Steenbergen
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan

Sunday, 18 August

Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Petri Helenius
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Patrick W. Gilmore
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Marshall Eubanks
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Tim Thorne
Re: Echo Brad Knowles
Re: Echo Brad Knowles
Anyone from Prodigy or L3 listening? (W32/Yaha Complaint) Richard Forno
new reverse-DNS generation process at APNIC George Michaelson

Monday, 19 August

Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jeff Ogden
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Owen DeLong
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Stephen J. Wilcox
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones michael . dillon
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jeff S Wheeler
Secure Cabinets Andrew Dorsett
Fwd: Re: Secure Cabinets Andrew Dorsett
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Marshall Eubanks
RE: Re: Secure Cabinets Benjamin J. Carrasco
RE: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Deepak Jain
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Greg Maxwell
RE: Re: Secure Cabinets Rishi Singh
RE: Major Labels v. Backbones Benjamin J. Carrasco
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Stephen Stuart
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones David Schwartz
95th percentile Scott Granados
Re: 95th percentile bmanning
Re: 95th percentile Scott Granados
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Tim Thorne
Re: 95th percentile Barb Dijker
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Joe Baptista
Re: Secure Cabinets Allan Liska
ASN registry? Ralph Doncaster
RE: ASN registry? Mark Segal
RE: Major Labels v. Backbones Dan Hollis
Re: ASN registry? Andy Dills
RE: ASN registry? Derek Samford
RE: ASN registry? Kris Foster
RE: ASN registry? Michael Hallgren
RE: ASN registry? Derek Samford
RE: ASN registry? Andy Dills
RE: ASN registry? Michael Hallgren
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones JC Dill
RE: ASN registry? Michael Hallgren
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Miles Fidelman
Re: ASN registry? Ralph Doncaster
Re: Secure Cabinets Brian
Re: Secure Cabinets Robert E. Seastrom
Sniffers/Analysers Dr. Mosh
RE: Sniffers/Analysers Stanley, Jon
RE: ASN registry? blitz
Re: Corporate PGP for network operators Len Sassaman
RE: ASN registry? Steve Meuse
Re: ASN registry? bmanning
Re: ASN registry? Philip Smith
Re: Fwd: Re: Secure Cabinets David Lesher
Broadview Networks Mike Moglin
Safety Alert: Fwd: Company Recalls DVM's blitz
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jeff Ogden
Re: ASN registry? Hank Nussbacher

Tuesday, 20 August

Re: ASN registry? Stephen J. Wilcox
Unrecognised packets cw
Re: ASN registry? Mark Prior
Re: Unrecognised packets Vadim Antonov
Re: Unrecognised packets cw
RE: Sniffers/Analysers Brennan_Murphy
RE: Unrecognised packets Daniska Tomas
Fall NANOG - held jointly with ARIN Susan Harris
Equinix Smart Hands Service Ali Jackson
Re: your mail Nathan Stratton
Re: your mail Alex Rubenstein
Re: your mail Paul Vixie
RE: your mail N. Richard Solis
Re: your mail David Diaz
RE: your mail Daniel Golding
Re: your mail Majdi S. Abbas
RE: your mail Deepak Jain
Re: your mail Richard A Steenbergen
Re: an itty bitty survey... Anthony Cennami
RE: your mail N. Richard Solis
RE: your mail Nathan Stratton
RE: your mail Nathan Stratton
RE: your mail Nathan Stratton
Re: your mail Scott Granados
Re: your mail Paul Vixie
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jeff Ogden
RE: your mail Deepak Jain
RE: your mail N. Richard Solis
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones bmanning
RE: your mail Patrick
Hovercraft for deliveries to the fifth floor loading dock (was Re: Your mail) Sean Donelan
IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org william
Re: Hovercraft for deliveries to the fifth floor loading dock (was Re: Your mail) Jay Adelson
Re: Hovercraft for deliveries to the fifth floor loading dock (was Re: Your mail) Patrick
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org william
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Avleen Vig
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org william
Verizon sued by RIAA ? Marshall Eubanks
Re: Hovercraft for deliveries to the fifth floor loading dock (was Re: Your mail) Jay Adelson
Re: your mail David Lesher
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Avleen Vig
Shared facilities (was Re: your mail) Sean Donelan

Wednesday, 21 August

Re: your mail Martin Hannigan
Re: Shared facilities (was Re: your mail) Martin Hannigan
Re[2]: your mail Richard Welty
RE: your mail N. Richard Solis
RE: Shared facilities (was Re: your mail) N. Richard Solis
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org sjj
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
Re: your mail Pawlukiewicz Jane
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Ron da Silva
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Peter van Dijk
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Dave Israel
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org batz
Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Sean Donelan
Re: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Mike Leber
RE: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) N. Richard Solis
QWest internet & the 1996 Telecom Act Andy
FC: RIAA presses Verizon for name of peer-to-peer subscriber (was: Verision being sued?) Gregory Hicks
FW: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) Jerry Eyers
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller
Re: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Vincent J. Bono
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Mark Segal
Re: FC: RIAA presses Verizon for name of peer-to-peer subscriber (was: Verision being sued?) Marshall Eubanks
DNS entries for infrastructure equipment Dan Lockwood
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org batz
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Derek Samford
Re: DNS entries for infrastructure equipment jnull
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Larry Rosenman
.mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Vinny Abello
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org william
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Jared Mauch
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Larry Rosenman
Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Joe Abley
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Jared Mauch
Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Pete Ehlke
Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Vinny Abello
Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Chris Adams
Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? bmanning
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org sjj
Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Randy Bush
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org don
Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Randy Bush
RE: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Al Rowland
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Al Rowland
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Jared Mauch
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org James Smith
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Larry Rosenman
RE: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Deepak Jain
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert A. Hayden
[Fwd: Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org] don
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Valdis . Kletnieks
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert A. Hayden
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Petri Helenius
Die thread, DIE! -> Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Vinny Abello
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org batz
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Randy Bush
RE: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Gerald
Draft of a new NANOG FAQ Susan Harris
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org william
EPOs in critical facilities Sean Donelan
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller
mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: EPOs in critical facilities Richard Welty
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Peter E. Fry
Re: DNS entries for infrastructure equipment Stephen Miller
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Al Rowland
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Peter E. Fry
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Barry Shein
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Vivien M.
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
RE: EPOs in critical facilities Deepak Jain
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles
Re: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Vincent J. Bono
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Vivien M.
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org william
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Dave Israel
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org J.A. Terranson
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Dave Israel
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Dave Israel
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org J.A. Terranson
Re: DNS entries for infrastructure equipment Richard A Steenbergen
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org William Rockwood
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
Re: [Fwd: Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org] Paul Vixie
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Paul Vixie
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Vivien M.
Re: [Fwd: Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org] Dave Stewart
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Nigel Clarke
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Ralph Doncaster
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Richard A Steenbergen
Controlling RIAA's "hired guns" Nigel Clarke
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Nigel Clarke
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Richard A Steenbergen
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? J.A. Terranson
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Miles Fidelman
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Dan Hollis
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Nigel Clarke
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Marshall Eubanks
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Vivien M.
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Christopher L. Morrow
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Valdis . Kletnieks
$12,000 per person registration fee (was RE: Eat this RIAA) Sean Donelan
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? David U.
RE: FORGET THE LETTERS (was RE: Eat this RIAA) Nigel Clarke
Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Chris Adams
Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Dave Stewart
Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? J.A. Terranson

Thursday, 22 August

Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Avleen Vig
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Rafi Sadowsky
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Rafi Sadowsky
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Scott Gifford
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Benjamin J. Carrasco
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Ian Cooper
sanity check frame question Brennan_Murphy
introducer trust model, Was: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) Karsten W. Rohrbach
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org William Warren
Re: sanity check frame question Stephen Sprunk
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Jeff Ogden
Re: sanity check frame question alex
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Nigel Clarke
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Valdis . Kletnieks
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Nigel Clarke
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Andy Dills
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org JC Dill
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Gregory Hicks
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Jeff Ogden
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? No One
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Owen DeLong
Re: $12,000 per person registration fee (was RE: Eat this RIAA) Owen DeLong
Re: $12,000 per person registration fee (was RE: Eat this RIAA) Robert A. Hayden
Re: $12,000 per person registration fee (was RE: Eat this RIAA) Ryan Fox
Re: introducer trust model, Was: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) Scott Francis
NANOG Mailing List FAQ - draft v2.0 JC Dill
Re: sanity check frame question Stephen Sprunk
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Rob Healey
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Vincent J. Bono
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Larry Rosenman
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Daniel Golding
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Stephen J. Wilcox
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Andy Dills
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? David Schwartz
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Paul Wouters
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? N. Richard Solis
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Vincent J. Bono
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? N. Richard Solis
Re: NANOG Mailing List FAQ - draft v2.0 JC Dill
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Barry Shein
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Alif The Terrible
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Dan Hollis
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Pawlukiewicz Jane
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? alex
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Paul Wouters
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Alif The Terrible
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Valdis . Kletnieks
www.habeas.com (was Re: introducer trust model, Was: Eat this ...) Paul Vixie
How does this help? blitz
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org william
Measuring BGP routes Dr. Mosh
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Tim Thorne
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Barry Shein
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org J.A. Terranson
Re: introducer trust model, Was: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Jeff Ogden
Re: introducer trust model, Was: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) Vadim Antonov
Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Majdi S. Abbas
RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Jim Popovitch
Re: How does this help? Martin

Friday, 23 August

Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Martin Cooper
Re: How does this help? Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Richard A Steenbergen
RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles
Re[3]: Die thread, DIE!) Richard Welty
RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles
RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Jim Popovitch
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? David Charlap
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor
wireless access point accounting Hugh Irvine
Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Rob Healey
RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: wireless access point accounting Spencer . Wood
Summary: what do you use to configure devices? Eliot Lear
Re: Measuring BGP routes Ezequiel Carson
Re: Measuring BGP routes Paul Donner
RE: Measuring BGP routes Frank Scalzo
Re: wireless access point accounting Christopher L. Morrow
Radware Peer Director Roy Hooper
Re: wireless access point accounting Spencer . Wood
RE: Measuring BGP routes Jeff S Wheeler
RE: Measuring BGP routes Bradley Dunn
RE: Measuring BGP routes Frank Scalzo
RE: Measuring BGP routes Paul Donner
Measuring BGP routes results Dr. Mosh
Re: Measuring BGP routes Bruce Pinsky
Re: Controlling RIAA's "hired guns" Scott Granados
The Cidr Report CIDR Report

Saturday, 24 August

Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Stewart, William C (Bill), RTLSL
Re: Measuring BGP routes results William Waites
Re: Measuring BGP routes results Nick Feamster

Sunday, 25 August

wcom issues in SF Bay area? Mark Kent
Re: Measuring BGP routes Nick Feamster
DNS "attack" Mark Kent
FYI: CIDR Report changes Philip Smith
Traffic Threshold monitoring? Rob Mitzel

Monday, 26 August

Re: Traffic Threshold monitoring? Eliot Lear
RE: Traffic Threshold monitoring? Jim Popovitch
Re: Traffic Threshold monitoring? Rafi Sadowsky
Bush's Cyber-Security Plan Targets E-Mail blitz
Re: Traffic Threshold monitoring? Art Houle
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Martin Cooper
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Paul Vixie
Re: Traffic Threshold monitoring? Gary E. Miller
Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Jeroen Massar
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Valdis . Kletnieks
Heads-up Randy Bush
RE: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Jeroen Massar
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Iljitsch van Beijnum
sprint biz dsl provisioning contact michael
Re: sprint biz dsl provisioning contact Gil Cohen
RE: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) David Van Duzer
Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Jeffrey Haas
Re: Measuring BGP routes Jeffrey Haas
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Scott Gifford
RE: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Barry Shein
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) David Van Duzer
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Scott Gifford
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Brad Knowles
Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Randy Bush
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Iljitsch van Beijnum
RE: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Jeroen Massar
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Scott Gifford
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) John Kristoff
RE: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Jeroen Massar
RE: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Barry Shein
RE: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) JC Dill
Anyone home at swbell.net? J.A. Terranson
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) John Kristoff
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Martin
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) David Schwartz
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) John Kristoff
RE: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Vivien M.
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Paul Vixie
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Paul Vixie
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Martin
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Patrick
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Paul Vixie
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at David Van Duzer
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Paul Vixie
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Patrick
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) John M. Brown
Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Mike Leber

Tuesday, 27 August

Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Mike Lyon
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Paul Vixie
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Bruce Campbell
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) michael . dillon
Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server CARL . P . HIRSCH
SWIP weirdness matthew zeier
198.41.0.0/22 ? whois-servers.net Mike Tancsa
IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Joe Baptista
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Stephen J. Wilcox
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic John Palmer
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Eric Gauthier
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Paul Vixie
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Paul Vixie
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Kevin Oberman
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Kevin Oberman
60 Hudson peering Ralph Doncaster
Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Mike Lyon
[OT] Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic William Waites
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Lyndon Nerenberg
Re: wcom issues in SF Bay area? Mark Kent
Re: 60 Hudson peering Jeffrey Meltzer
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Petri Helenius
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Peter John Hill
Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Karsten W. Rohrbach
RE: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Barry Shein
OC-48 failure last night Roy
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Brad Knowles
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Marshall Eubanks
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Kurtis Lindqvist
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Peter John Hill
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Barry Shein
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Paul Vixie
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Barry Shein
Re: 60 Hudson peering Ralph Doncaster
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Brad Knowles
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Brad Knowles
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Brad Knowles
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Brad Knowles
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Brad Knowles
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Brad Knowles
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Brad Knowles
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Paul Vixie
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Brad Knowles
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Brad Knowles
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) David Schwartz
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Jim Hickstein
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Jim Hickstein
Will Canada's Internet providers become spies? Joe Baptista
RE: Will Canada's Internet providers become spies? Phil Rosenthal
Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server John Todd
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) David Schwartz
Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server bmanning
Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Majdi S. Abbas
Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server David G. Andersen
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Jim Hickstein
Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Mike Lyon

Wednesday, 28 August

Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server David G. Andersen
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Kurtis Lindqvist
Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Randy Bush
Public-held Tier2/3 ISPs A H
Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Robert E. Seastrom
Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Majdi S. Abbas
Re: Standalone Stratum 1 NTP Server Johannes Ullrich
Updated DNS monitoring Rob Thomas
Verizon Contact Erich Kuehn
RE: Verizon Contact Steve Miller
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Peter John Hill
Re: Updated DNS monitoring Gerald
Re: Updated DNS monitoring Rob Thomas
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Andy Dills
DNS monitoring - mirror site Rob Thomas
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Lyndon Nerenberg
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Paul Vixie
AT&T NYC Bryan Heitman
Re: AT&T NYC Manolo Hernandez
Re: AT&T NYC Wes Bachman
Re: AT&T NYC Matt Buford
Re: AT&T NYC Spencer . Wood
Re: AT&T NYC Mike Tancsa
Re: AT&T NYC Matt Martini
RE: AT&T NYC OUMERA Hazim FTLD/IAP
Re: AT&T NYC Mike Tancsa
Re: AT&T NYC, Earthlink Atlanta, Sprint Tacoma Sean Donelan
Re: AT&T NYC Matt Levine
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Brad Knowles
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Brad Knowles
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Brad Knowles
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Barry Shein
Routing Problems? Mike Moglin
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) David Schwartz
RE: AT&T NYC Frank Scalzo
RE: AT&T NYC Mikael Abrahamsson
RE: AT&T NYC Mike Tancsa
Re: AT&T NYC Richard A Steenbergen
Re: AT&T NYC Me
Contact for dmisinetworks.com / Avleen Vig
Icelandic service restored Sean Donelan

Thursday, 29 August

Re: AT&T NYC Petri Helenius
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Scott A Crosby
Re: Contact for dmisinetworks.com / blitz
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Kurtis Lindqvist
RE: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Jeroen Massar
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic Kurtis Lindqvist
Re: (RADIATOR) wireless access point accounting Hugh Irvine
AT&T outage Manolo Hernandez
irtf-chair () ietf org: Internet Measurement Research Group Mark Allman
Re: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic David Charlap
Broadening the IPv6 discussion Irwin Lazar
RE: AT&T NYC Daniel Golding
RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Daniel Golding
RE: AT&T NYC NAIDOO Kesva FTLD/IAP
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Stephen Sprunk
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Paul Vixie
RE: AT&T NYC Brian Wallingford
RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Dave Israel
RE: AT&T NYC alex
Re: AT&T NYC Peter van Dijk
Re: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster
Re: AT&T NYC Richard A Steenbergen
Re: AT&T NYC Chris Woodfield
RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Mike Leber
Re: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden
routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ralph Doncaster
RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren
Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Robert A. Hayden
RE: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden
RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld
RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld
RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius
building a better route reflector dalph
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Kurtis Lindqvist
RE: AT&T NYC Daniel Golding
RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: building a better route reflector dalph
RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster
Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ross Chandler
RE: AT&T NYC Daniel Golding
RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford
RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster
RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster
RE: AT&T NYC Dmitri Krioukov
Re: AT&T NYC William Waites
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius
RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford
RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford
Re: AT&T NYC alex
Re: AT&T NYC alex
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Kevin Oberman
RE: AT&T NYC alex
Re: AT&T NYC Mark Kent
Re: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org) Brad Knowles
RE: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Brad Knowles
ospf problems? bandyrush

Friday, 30 August

Re: building a better route reflector Neil J. McRae
Re: RIAA Daniska Tomas
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius
Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Kurtis Lindqvist
Re: building a better route reflector Stephen J. Wilcox
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Kurtis Lindqvist
Re: ospf problems? Michael . Dillon
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Kurtis Lindqvist
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Petri Helenius
RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Iljitsch van Beijnum
RE: AT&T NYC alex
RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum
RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Jeroen Massar
Re: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Marshall Eubanks
RE: AT&T NYC alex
RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: ospf problems? Paul Vixie
RE: ospf problems? Derek Samford
RE: Paul's Mailfrom (Was: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at Barry Shein
Re: building a better route reflector dalph
RE: Broadening the IPv6 discussion Jeroen Massar
Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? William B. Norton
Praise to XO's Security/Abuse John M. Brown
Re: Praise to XO's Security/Abuse JC Dill
looking for benchmarks for campus and metropolitan networks Miles Fidelman

Saturday, 31 August

Re: Do ATM-based Exchange Points make sense anymore? Petri Helenius
Re: Praise to XO's Security/Abuse Simon Lyall
Re: Praise to XO's Security/Abuse JC Dill
Bad bad routing problems? Gerald
Re: Bad bad routing problems? Jesper Skriver
Re: Bad bad routing problems? Mike Tancsa
RE: Bad bad routing problems? Malayter, Christopher
Re: Bad bad routing problems? Mark Kent
RE: Bad bad routing problems? Michael Hallgren
Re: Bad bad routing problems? Gerald
Re: Bad bad routing problems? David G. Andersen

Saturday, 04 February

[no subject] Unknown
[no subject] Unknown
[no subject] Unknown
[no subject] Unknown

Previous period

Next period