nanog mailing list archives
RE: AT&T NYC
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph () istop com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:44:22 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Derek Samford wrote:
I personally prefer using IS-IS for loopback/infrastructure routes, and I use confederations for my IBGP. If a confederation ever gets to large, I can always add a route-reflector inside the confederation. Ralph, you have never failed to amaze me with your love for WCP (Worst Current Practices.)
OK, then hand me a clue and explain why ruing an iBGP mesh with 3-4 routers is so bad (seeing as Bassam Halabi didn't in his book). -Ralph
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- Re: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld (Aug 29)
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ross Chandler (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Kurtis Lindqvist (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC William Waites (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Mark Kent (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Daniel Golding (Aug 29)