nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n
From: sal_sabella () hushmail com
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 09:19:15 -0700
Randy Bush wrote:
in my experience, and measuring by the contect of my .procmailrc, newbies are not the s:n problem
A far bigger problem is when former Verio employees escape from their containment facility on Bainbridge Island. Sal P.S.: Bandy sends his regards. Communicate in total privacy. Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 Looking for a good deal on a domain name? http://www.hush.com/partners/offers.cgi?id=domainpeople
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n, (continued)
- Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 08)
- RE: NANOG, its decline in s/n Derek Samford (Aug 08)
- Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Rob Healey (Aug 08)
- Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n David Diaz (Aug 08)
- Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Randy Bush (Aug 08)
- Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Andy Dills (Aug 08)
- RE: NANOG, its decline in s/n Derek Samford (Aug 08)
- RE: NANOG, its decline in s/n Andy Dills (Aug 08)
- RE: NANOG, its decline in s/n Derek Samford (Aug 08)
- Re: NANOG, its decline in s/n Rob Healey (Aug 08)