nanog mailing list archives
RE: AT&T NYC
From: alex () yuriev com
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 08:29:00 -0400 (EDT)
Practices.)OK, then hand me a clue and explain why ruing an iBGP mesh with 3-4 routers is so bad (seeing as Bassam Halabi didn't in his book).I would definately not recommend route reflection or a confederation in a network with such a small number of BGP routers: you add lots of complexity, potential for less optimal routing (and possibly obscure implementation problems) and the only thing you gain is not having to the existing BGP routers when you add a new one.
In spirit of the above, I suggest you also do not have maintenance window, forget about re-checking configs, enable to do the simpliest commands, and of course let everyone try debugging any problems by typing random commands into your routers. After all, your network consists of only 4 routers. Alex P.S. In case it not clear, the above paragraph is not what you should ever do.
Current thread:
- RE: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC William Waites (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Mark Kent (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Daniel Golding (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Dmitri Krioukov (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)