nanog mailing list archives
RE: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump?
From: Lane Patterson <lpatterson () equinix com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 14:55:06 -0700
But LINX, Equinix, and other exchanges have been very stable on Foundry running both layer 2 and layer 3 code images. So I don't think all the blame falls on Foundry. I think a rigorous hardware/software support plan, aggressive management of vendor support, sufficient test lab, and conservative upgrade process are just as essential to stability. Of course what I really want for Xmas is a Force10 box ;-) Cheers, -Lane
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Granados [mailto:scott () graphidelix net] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 8:12 PM To: Peter van Dijk Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Its extreme I believe. Black Diamonds? On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Peter van Dijk wrote:On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:03:12AM -0700, Stephen Stuart wrote: [snip]They were; hopefully you mailed them and received ananswer to thateffect. A software fault took down one of the switches,and the vendoris being made aware of the problem they need to fix.Given all the trouble AMS-IX has with Foundry, I'd like toknow: whatvendor is that? Greetz, Peter
Current thread:
- Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Stephen Stuart (Aug 01)
- Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Peter van Dijk (Aug 01)
- Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Scott Granados (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Stephen Stuart (Aug 01)
- RE: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Lane Patterson (Aug 02)
- Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Nipper, Arnold (Aug 02)
- Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Stephen Stuart (Aug 02)
- Re: Is the PAIX Palo Alto taking a dump? Peter van Dijk (Aug 01)