nanog mailing list archives
Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes
From: <bdragon () gweep net>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:44:16 -0400 (EDT)
In addition, many networks will not accept /24s from the former B-class space which is now being assigned by the various regional registries.
I checked: http://www.arin.net/statistics/index.html#cidr http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/smallest-alloc-sizes.html http://www.apnic.net/db/min-alloc.html and don't see any of the RIRs allocating smaller than /16 from 128/2
Current thread:
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes), (continued)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Aug 09)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Adam Rothschild (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Chris Woodfield (Aug 07)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Derek Samford (Aug 07)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 07)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Aug 07)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bmanning (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bdragon (Aug 06)
- "... I don't think that means what he thinks it means..." bmanning (Aug 07)