nanog mailing list archives

www.habeas.com (was Re: introducer trust model, Was: Eat this ...)

From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 22 Aug 2002 21:48:50 +0000

...
the same problems apply to blocking incoming SMTP connections, or mails
from/to specific addresses, SPAM.

thinking a little bit more about the issue with networked services in
general (including SMTP and the spam/abuse problems, as well as
filesharing and many more), the conclusive decision would be to define a
bullet proof standard on introducer based trust, deriving a certain trust
level or metric from a peer-trust based trust chain. ...


A friend of mine recently started Habeas (see http://www.habeas.com/) and
since I have no financial or operational connection to them I feel pretty
free to state publically that there are non-web-of-trust introducer models
available which might pan out pretty well even though they're profitable.
-- 
Paul Vixie

Current thread:

Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Steven M. Bellovin (Aug 21)
- introducer trust model, Was: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) Karsten W. Rohrbach (Aug 22)
  - Re: introducer trust model, Was: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) Scott Francis (Aug 22)
  - www.habeas.com (was Re: introducer trust model, Was: Eat this ...) Paul Vixie (Aug 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Benjamin J. Carrasco (Aug 22)
- RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Gregory Hicks (Aug 22)
- RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? No One (Aug 22)
- Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs? Stewart, William C (Bill), RTLSL (Aug 24)