nanog mailing list archives
Re: Major Labels v. Backbones
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph () istop com>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 19:17:54 -0400 (EDT)
In the meantime, you will have to continue to pay your staff, spend your own time and upgrade your routers to do the RIAA's dirty work for them. Happy networking.
Doesn't anyone have any balls? The lawyers are making lots of money sending out nastygrams, so billing for work related to finding customers who infringe on copyrights is more than fair. http://www.istop.com/BSALetter.txt -Ralph
Current thread:
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones, (continued)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 16)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones blitz (Aug 16)
- Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan (Aug 16)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones senthil ayyasamy (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Marshall Eubanks (Aug 19)
- RE: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Deepak Jain (Aug 19)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Stephen Stuart (Aug 19)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Tim Thorne (Aug 19)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Joe Baptista (Aug 19)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 16)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Ralph Doncaster (Aug 17)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Petri Helenius (Aug 18)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Marshall Eubanks (Aug 18)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Tim Thorne (Aug 18)
- Anyone from Prodigy or L3 listening? (W32/Yaha Complaint) Richard Forno (Aug 18)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 19)
- Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Greg Maxwell (Aug 19)