nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSPs filter?
From: Chris Woodfield <rekoil () semihuman com>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 23:19:35 -0400
IMO, Commercial ISPs should never filter customer packets unless specifically requested to do so by the customer, or in response to a security/abuse incident. Consumer ISPs are much more likely to have clauses in the AUPs that are enforced premptively via packet filtering - antispoof filters (honestly, antispoof filtering is, IMHO, the one expection to my "commercial ISPs should not filter" rule), port blocks to prevent customers running servers, outbound SMTP blocks to off-provider systems to stop direct-to-MX spamming, ICMP rate limiting, et al. All of which are fine by me as long as they clearly assert their right to do so in their AUP - that is, as long as there's a comparable provider I can use instead. -C On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 02:37:12PM +0000, bmanning () karoshi com wrote:
Good day, What NSPs do filter packets, and can really deal with DoS and DDoS attacks? -Abdullah Bin Hamad A.K.A ArabianThe shorter shorter list would be the NSPs that do NOT filter packets. I can't think of an NSP that does not filter. --bill
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- NSPs filter? Abdullah Bin Hamad - Arabian (Aug 04)
- Re: NSPs filter? bmanning (Aug 04)
- Re: NSPs filter? Chris Woodfield (Aug 04)
- Re: NSPs filter? bmanning (Aug 04)
- Re: NSPs filter? Stephen Stuart (Aug 04)
- Re: NSPs filter? Chris Woodfield (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? John M. Brown (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? Måns Nilsson (Aug 14)
- Re: NSPs filter? Chris Woodfield (Aug 04)
- Re: NSPs filter? Jared Mauch (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? John M. Brown (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? Scott Granados (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? bmanning (Aug 04)
- Re: NSPs filter? Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 05)
- Re: NSPs filter? bdragon (Aug 05)