nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting )
From: Kurtis Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:32:33 +0200 (CEST)
Um. Set up more than one reflector....So how many is enough? I would think 3 is a minimum to come close to the reliability/redundancy of OSPF.
I fail to see what reflectors have to do with stability (except for the obicous human errors and configuration mistakes). Reflectors and confederations is more to help with scaling. And I would then expect the number of BGP speaking routers to be up around 10-15-20. It doesn't make much sense below that (unless you are playing with the number of routes on boxes). Last I fail to see what the number of reflectors have to do with correlation to a IGP? - kurtis -
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- Re: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Chris Woodfield (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld (Aug 29)
- RE: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Jason Lixfeld (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Ross Chandler (Aug 29)
- Re: routing architectures ( was Re: AT&T NYCrouting ) Kurtis Lindqvist (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Michael Hallgren (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Robert A. Hayden (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC William Waites (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Mark Kent (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)