nanog mailing list archives
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
From: "Robert Blayzor" <rblayzor () inoc net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 15:29:46 -0400
Really good idea (no sarcasm, I actually like it).. But what stops spammers from registering their mail server?..Ie.. 1) Get a dsl account 2) Ips get swipped to you 3) Register the server 4) SPAM 5) Apologize, get a second chance 6) get booted off 7) Call the next ISP with a zero install 8) Rinse and repeat.
Treat them sort of like SSL certs now. Charge an annual registrar fee per company, not per server. (Something like $100 a year) The more they have to go out of their way to get their spam server online, the more they would be deterred to do so. They're only going to want to change so many ISP's, go through SWIP and then change their legal name for the registrar so many times. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC rblayzor () inoc net Life would be much easier if I had the source code.
Current thread:
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, (continued)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org batz (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org batz (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Gary E. Miller (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org batz (Aug 21)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Al Rowland (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org william (Aug 21)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Jared Mauch (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Jared Mauch (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Aug 21)