nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T NYC
From: alex () yuriev com
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:44:29 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:09:54PM -0400, alex () yuriev com wrote:Has anybody mentioned the benefits of ISIS as an IGP to them.Link-state protocols are evil, and when they break, they *really* break. I still do not see a compeling argument for not using BGP as your IGP.Slow convergence.
If you do not randomly MESS with your routers and circuits outside the maintenance window, your customers will apreciate stability over how fast it converge. As alternative, you get full blown outages a-la AboveNet and AT&T. Alex
Current thread:
- RE: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Daniel Golding (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Dmitri Krioukov (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)