nanog mailing list archives

Re: operational context? Re: signature


From: Scott Granados <scott () graphidelix net>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 17:42:52 -0700 (PDT)


Hmmm, do pgp sig's count and aren't they longer?

I still like the idea that using longer sigs will use up extra unused 
fiber:)
On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Jim 
Mercer wrote:


On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 12:51:18AM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 6:28 PM -0400 2002/08/07, William Warren wrote:
My sig is now 4 lines.

    It's not just the total number of lines.  It's also about the 
number of characters on each line -- .sigs should generally be 
wrapped at 72-75 characters, just like e-mail messages.

i'm certainly glad the moderator of the list is watching to make sure
people don't drone on endlessly about such non-operational issues such as
SPAM.

the length of one's signature and/or expressing one's religious
beliefs must have some obscure operational context.

--jim
fully expecting to have posting privileges revoked for another 6 months.



Current thread: