nanog mailing list archives
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes
From: "Phil Rosenthal" <pr () isprime com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:29:58 -0400
Most ISPs that build off of the IRR's do it nightly. I am talking about 10 /24's out of /19, and I'm not announcing any of the /24's -- and wont unless there is an emergency, and only then would it be temporary. --Phil -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Omachonu Ogali Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 4:00 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes What about announcing and registering with your IRR, more-specific routes for the period that the problem ONLY exists, instead of being lazy? If all else fails, break out Outlook and your favorite translator, because last time I checked, speaking English was not a requirement to run a network. Even if most of you do, this is not a "Majority Rules" situation. On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 10:47:33PM -0700, john () chagresventures com wrote:
get on the bandwaggon that filtering is a good thing ?? :) at some point some transit is going to listen and drop the announcement. Lets take an example. Deep Dark middle of asia, someone starts announcing a /24 of yours. Their upstream takes the packet, and so forth. At some point they will touch a NSP or ISP (international service provider) and you can get things dropped their.
Yes. End of story. Go directly to the finish diamond at the end of your flowchart. If the next step in your flowchart is "pollute IRRs with 3592375238957235893275839572 /32s", please return your maintainer object.
Your pushing out a /24 will help slurp some of the traffic towards you, but not all. Personally I have deagged some prefixes to cause a DOS/DDOS towards a particular address to route down a slow connection I had. Sacrifice one link, to keep customers running on the others. But thats
different. Yes, but you removed it later on, correct?
Its about networking, the people kind, at this point. cheers john brown chagres technologies, inc On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 09:00:55PM -0400, Phil Rosenthal wrote:But the question is, what do you do if it's coming from somewhere with a difficult to contact NOC, and their upstream is difficult to contact as well? --Phil -----Original Message----- From: John M. Brown [mailto:jmbrown () ihighway net] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 8:12 PM To: Phil Rosenthal Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Hmm, this would be a "Bad Idea" (TM) (C) 2002, DMCA Protected Having had this happen to me several different times, I'd have to recommend, calling the NOC of the advertising party. as the pref'd
way
of handling it. On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 06:41:22PM -0400, Phil Rosenthal wrote:I am currently announcing only my aggregate routes, but I have lately thought about the possibility of someone mistakenly, or
maliciously,
announcing more specifics from my space. The best solution for an emergency response to that (that I can think of), is registering
all
of the /24's that make up my network, so if someone should
announce a
more-specific, I can always announce the most specific that would
be
accepted (assuming they don't announce the /24's too, it should be
a
problem avoided) Does anyone else have any other ideas on ways to quickly deal with someone else announcing your more specifics, since contacting
their
NOC is likely going to take a long time... --Phil
-- Omachonu Ogali missnglnk () informationwave net http://www.informationwave.net
Current thread:
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes, (continued)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Simon Lockhart (Aug 05)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bmanning (Aug 05)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes John M. Brown (Aug 05)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Aug 05)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes jnull (Aug 05)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes John M. Brown (Aug 05)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes john (Aug 05)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Ratul Mahajan (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Jared Mauch (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Dominic J. Eidson (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Aug 05)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes nanog (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Omachonu Ogali (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Brad Knowles (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes E.B. Dreger (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Aug 06)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes E.B. Dreger (Aug 06)