nanog: by thread

• RSS Feed
• About List
• All Lists

Previous period

Next period

130 messages starting May 02 24 and ending May 17 24
Date index | Thread index | Author index

• Sneak Peek of NANOG 91 + MORE Nanog News (May 02)
• fubo.tv NOC contact Adair Winter (May 03)
• Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account (May 03)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account (May 10)
  • Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account (May 17)
• Fwd: [MNNOG] mnNOG 6: Call For Presentations bayar batjargal (May 07)
• Frontier fiber outage in Tampa Bay? David Hubbard (May 07)
  • RE: Frontier fiber outage in Tampa Bay? Greg Dickinson (May 07)
• Spoofer Report for NANOG for Apr 2024 CAIDA Spoofer Project (May 08)
• Roku Streaming Issues Corey Smith via NANOG (May 08)
  • RE: Roku Streaming Issues John Stitt (May 08)
• Re: Steve Bellovin retires Patrick Gilmore (May 09)
• Apply Now for an ARIN Community Grant John Sweeting (May 09)
• Spectrum residential IPv6 issues - contact off-list ? vom513 (May 09)
  • Re: Spectrum residential IPv6 issues - contact off-list ? J. Hellenthal via NANOG (May 09)
    • Re: Spectrum residential IPv6 issues - contact off-list ? vom513 (May 09)
• NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center issued a Severe (G4) Geomagnetic Storm Watch John Curran (May 10)
  • Re: NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center issued a Severe (G4) Geomagnetic Storm Watch Randy Bush (May 10)
  • Re: NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center issued a Severe (G4) Geomagnetic Storm Watch Mel Beckman (May 10)
    • Re: NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center issued a Severe (G4) Geomagnetic Storm Watch Jay R. Ashworth (May 10)
    • Re: NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center issued a Severe (G4) Geomagnetic Storm Watch Raymond Burkholder (May 10)
      • Re: NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center issued a Severe (G4) Geomagnetic Storm Watch Mel Beckman (May 10)
• Alien Waves Mike Hammett (May 12)
  • Re: Alien Waves Dave Cohen (May 12)
    • Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
      • Re: Alien Waves Dave Cohen (May 12)
      • Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Alien Waves Mike Hammett (May 12)
      • Re: Alien Waves Dave Cohen (May 12)
      • Re: Alien Waves Brandon Martin (May 12)
      • Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Alien Waves Dave Cohen (May 12)
      • Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
  • Re: Alien Waves Mark Tinka (May 12)
  • Re: Alien Waves eric c (May 13)
• Re: Whitebox Routers Beyond the Datasheet Mike Hammett (May 12)
• Re: VDSL >2 Pair Bonding Modems Mike Hammett (May 12)
• [Event] Call for Presentations EPF 2024, Vienna, Austria // NANOG Arnold Nipper via NANOG (May 13)
• Small Internet border router options? Tom Samplonius (May 13)
  • RE: Small Internet border router options? Tony Wicks (May 13)
    • Re: Small Internet border router options? Christopher Hawker (May 14)
  • Re: Small Internet border router options? Jean Franco (May 13)
    • Re: Small Internet border router options? Harlan Stenn via NANOG (May 13)
      • Re: Small Internet border router options? Mel Beckman (May 13)
      • Re: Small Internet border router options? Heasley (May 13)
  • Re: Small Internet border router options? Pim van Pelt via NANOG (May 13)
  • Re: Small Internet border router options? Rubens Kuhl (May 14)
    • Re: Small Internet border router options? Brandon Martin (May 15)
  • Re: Small Internet border router options? Richard Holbo (May 14)
• TIMELY - FINAL REMINDER - ARIN Email Template Retirement Scheduled for 3 June 2024 John Curran (May 13)
• On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 John Kristoff (May 13)
  • Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 borg (May 14)
    • Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 John Kristoff (May 14)
      • Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 borg (May 14)
      • Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 John Kristoff (May 14)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (May 14)
    • Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 Tom Beecher (May 14)
      • Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 borg (May 14)
      • Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 Warren Kumari (May 14)
• GOV zone operational update: DNSSEC transition to algorithm 13 Christian Elmerot (May 13)
• NANOG 91: Keynote & Conference Kit Announcement 📢 + More Nanog News (May 14)
• Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Adam Thompson (May 14)
  • Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Mel Beckman (May 14)
    • RE: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Adam Thompson (May 14)
    • Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? William Herrin (May 15)
    • Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Nicolas VUILLERMET (May 15)
      • Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Adam Thompson (May 15)
      • Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Michel Blais (May 15)
      • Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Randy Bush (May 15)
      • Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? William Herrin (May 15)
    • Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Jay Acuna (May 15)
      • Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Mel Beckman (May 15)
      • Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? William Herrin (May 16)
      • Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Mel Beckman (May 16)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Willy Manga (May 15)
  • Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Willy Manga (May 15)
• FCC proposes Internet Routing Security Reporting Requirements Job Snijders via NANOG (May 15)
  • Re: FCC proposes Internet Routing Security Reporting Requirements Job Snijders via NANOG (May 16)
• Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 15)
  • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Mel Beckman (May 15)
  • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Bjørn Mork (May 15)
    • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Peter Potvin via NANOG (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John Levine (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure William Herrin (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John R. Levine (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John R. Levine (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Tom Beecher (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Tom Beecher (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Karl Auer (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Hank Nussbacher (May 16)
      • Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Karl Auer (May 17)
• Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Sean Donelan (May 16)
  • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Brandon Zhi (May 16)
    • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Josh Luthman (May 16)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Job Snijders via NANOG (May 16)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Josh Luthman (May 16)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Mike Hammett (May 17)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Tom Beecher (May 17)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Sean Donelan (May 17)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Brandon Martin (May 16)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Job Snijders via NANOG (May 16)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Michael Thomas (May 16)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities John Levine (May 16)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Michael Thomas (May 16)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Sean Donelan (May 17)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Ca By (May 17)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Tom Beecher (May 17)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Ca By (May 17)
      • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Tom Beecher (May 17)
    • Re: Should FCC look at SS7 vulnerabilities or BGP vulnerabilities Mark Tinka (May 16)
• Meet NANOG's New Executive Director! N91 Agenda is LIVE! + More Nanog News (May 16)
  • Re: Meet NANOG's New Executive Director! N91 Agenda is LIVE! + More Job Snijders via NANOG (May 16)
• Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG (May 17)
  • Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? William Herrin (May 17)
    • Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? jim deleskie (May 17)
    • Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? John Levine (May 17)
      • Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? William Herrin (May 17)
      • Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? John R. Levine (May 17)
    • Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Jon Lewis (May 17)
• Packet loss and latency between Akamai and NTT in Miami Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (May 17)
  • Re: Packet loss and latency between Akamai and NTT in Miami Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG (May 17)
  • Re: Packet loss and latency between Akamai and NTT in Miami Aaron Atac via NANOG (May 17)

Previous period

Next period