Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24

[borg () uu3 net]

No, I am not confusing those two. Actually, Im using 192.0.2.0 as well
here, for server's internal SNAT.

Okey, I checked that registry and there is nothing I care about.
It seems the choice to using 192.0.0.0/24 internally at desktop
was smart enough ;)

Thx for info.


---------- Original message ----------

From: John Kristoff <jtk () dataplane org>
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 07:29:54 -0500

On Tue, 14 May 2024 12:00:15 +0200 (CEST)
borg () uu3 net wrote:

> Was RFC5736 obsoleted?

No.

> Its a nice tiny subnet for special purposes. I personaly use it

Are you confusing this with 192.0.2.0/24?  192.0.0.0/24 is occasionally
updated with new assignments drawn from it.  Just be aware you're
potentially colliding with some other, new use in that range.

John