Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable?

[Willy Manga <willym () manbene net>]

Hi,

On 15/05/2024 16:00, nanog-request () nanog org wrote:
> Message: 10
> Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 19:52:43 +0000
> From: Adam Thompson<athompson () merlin mb ca>
> To: nanog<nanog () nanog org>
> Subject: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable?
> Message-ID:
>         <YT3PR01MB10768B5A9FEFE157A78096F509BE32 () YT3PR01MB10768 CANPRD01 PROD OUTLOOK COM>
>         
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Not an IPv6 newbie by any stretch, but we still aren't doing it "at
> scale" and some of you are, so...
>
> For a very small & dense (on 128-bit scales, anyway) network, is
> RFC3531 still the last word in IPv6 allocation strategies?

You can read this article [1] . It's a more 'contemporary' approach.


1. 
https://www.daryllswer.com/ipv6-architecture-and-subnetting-guide-for-network-engineers-and-operators/


--
Willy Manga