nanog mailing list archives

Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24

From: John Kristoff <jtk () dataplane org>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 07:29:54 -0500

On Tue, 14 May 2024 12:00:15 +0200 (CEST)
borg () uu3 net wrote:

Was RFC5736 obsoleted?

No.

Its a nice tiny subnet for special purposes. I personaly use it


Are you confusing this with 192.0.2.0/24?  192.0.0.0/24 is occasionally
updated with new assignments drawn from it.  Just be aware you're
potentially colliding with some other, new use in that range.

John

Current thread:

On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 John Kristoff (May 13)
- Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 borg (May 14)
  - Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 John Kristoff (May 14)
    - Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 borg (May 14)
    - Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 John Kristoff (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (May 14)
  - Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 Tom Beecher (May 14)
    - Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 borg (May 14)
    - Re: On consistency and 192.0.0.0/24 Warren Kumari (May 14)