nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute?
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 15:04:07 -0700
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 9:55 AM Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
Also poking around on RIPE Atlas suggests that for a non-zero amount of networks in India the C DNS Root Server that cogent runs is inaccessible: https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements/71894623#probes
I don't understand why Cogent is allowed to operate one of the root servers. Doesn't ICANN do any kind of technical background check on companies when letting the contract? For those who haven't been around long enough, this isn't Cogent's first depeering argument. Nor their second. And they're behaving unreasonably. I don't know any of the details -this time- but historically speaking Cogent is behaving badly -again- and you can take that to the bank. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG (May 17)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? William Herrin (May 17)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? jim deleskie (May 17)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Bill Woodcock (May 17)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? John Levine (May 17)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? William Herrin (May 17)
- Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? John R. Levine (May 17)
- Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? Bill Woodcock (May 17)
- Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? William Herrin (May 17)
- Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? David Conrad via NANOG (May 19)
- Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? John R. Levine (May 19)
- Re: who runs the root, Cogent-TATA peering dispute? David Conrad via NANOG (May 19)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? jim deleskie (May 17)
- Re: Cogent-TATA peering dispute? William Herrin (May 17)