nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mailing list SPF Failure
From: Peter Potvin via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 11:11:47 -0400
Appears there’s no SPF record at all now for nanog.org, which is not ideal… Kind regards, Peter Potvin On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:59 Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no> wrote:
"Scott Q." <qmail () top-consulting net> writes:Anyone else getting SPF failures on all messages sent to the list ? I see them all originating from 50.31.151.76 but nanog.org's SPF record doesn't list that as allowed.I see the same. nanog.org mail is originated from 2001:1838:2001:8:0:0:0:20 or 50.31.151.76, and the SPF record is currently "v=spf1 a include:_spf.google.com ~all" Neither of those are Google addresses so it's a soft fail. Bjørn
Current thread:
- Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 15)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Mel Beckman (May 15)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Bjørn Mork (May 15)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Peter Potvin via NANOG (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John Levine (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure William Herrin (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John R. Levine (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John R. Levine (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Tom Beecher (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Peter Potvin via NANOG (May 16)