nanog mailing list archives

Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable?

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 10:20:44 -0700

The minimum addressable on a LAN is a /64.


not really

randy

Current thread:

Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Adam Thompson (May 14)
- Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Mel Beckman (May 14)
  - RE: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Adam Thompson (May 14)
  - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? William Herrin (May 15)
  - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Nicolas VUILLERMET (May 15)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Adam Thompson (May 15)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Michel Blais (May 15)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Randy Bush (May 15)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? William Herrin (May 15)
  - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Jay Acuna (May 15)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Mel Beckman (May 15)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? William Herrin (May 16)
    - Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Mel Beckman (May 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Willy Manga (May 15)
- Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable? Willy Manga (May 15)