nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mailing list SPF Failure
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 16 May 2024 18:56:55 -0400
On Thu, 16 May 2024, William Herrin wrote:
The message content (including the message headers) is theoretically not used for SPF validation. In practice, some SPF validators don't have direct access to the SMTP session so they rely on the SMTP session placing the envelope sender in the Return-path header.
But that wasn't the problem here, the SPF record was just gone. Oops.I see that the SPF record is back and seems have the correct addresses so we can now return to our previously scheduled flamage.
Regards, John Levine, johnl () taugh com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
Current thread:
- Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 15)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Mel Beckman (May 15)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Bjørn Mork (May 15)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Peter Potvin via NANOG (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John Levine (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure William Herrin (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John R. Levine (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure John R. Levine (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Tom Beecher (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Peter Potvin via NANOG (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Tom Beecher (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Scott Q. (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Michael Thomas (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Karl Auer (May 16)
- Re: Mailing list SPF Failure Hank Nussbacher (May 16)