nanog: by date

369 messages starting Apr 01 22 and ending Apr 30 22
Date index | Thread index | Author index

Friday, 01 April

Re: What's a "normal" ratio of web sites to IP addresses... John McCormac
Re: IPv6 Only Masataka Ohta
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Rubens Kuhl
RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Ryland Kremeier
Re: IPv6 "bloat" history Masataka Ohta
Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
RE: IPv6 "bloat" history Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported James R Cutler
deadly wifi William Herrin
Proper Planning for Cellular Networks in Ukraine Sean Donelan
RFC 9225 - Software Defects Considered Harmful Job Snijders via NANOG
RE: DMARC ViolationAS21299 - 46.42.196.0/24 ASN prepending 255 times Adam Thompson
Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
RE: Opinions on Arista for BGP? Adam Thompson
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Opinions on Arista for BGP? Jeff Tantsura
Re: Cogent ... Eric Kuhnke
Re: Opinions on Arista for BGP? jim deleskie
Re: RFC 9225 - Software Defects Considered Harmful Eric Kuhnke
Re: RFC 9225 - Software Defects Considered Harmful Christopher Morrow
Re: RFC 9225 - Software Defects Considered Harmful Mel Beckman
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Re: 20220326125.AYC Seth David Schoen
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Anthony Newman via NANOG

Saturday, 02 April

RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported christian de larrinaga via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Abraham Y. Chen
Re: V6 still not supported Matthew Petach
Unsolicited marketing (was: Re: Cogent ...) John Curran
TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) John Curran
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Jeroen Massar via NANOG
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Niels Bakker
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Michael Thomas
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Jeroen Massar via NANOG
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email John Curran
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Michael Thomas
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported Fred Baker
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Michael Thomas
Re: [nanog] Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
Re: [nanog] Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email John Levine
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email John Levine
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email from poorly configured senders John Levine
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Michael Thomas
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Michael Thomas
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email John Levine
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Michael Thomas
Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Re: [nanog] Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta

Sunday, 03 April

Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) David Ratkay
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Bjørn Mork
V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Dave Taht
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Masataka Ohta
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email John Levine
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Randy Bush
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Bjørn Mork
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email nanog
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Mark Tinka
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Bjørn Mork
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Michael Thomas
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email John Levine
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Andy Ringsmuth
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Dave Taht
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Dave Taht
is it still nfsen? Randy Bush
Re: is it still nfsen? Mel Beckman
RE: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG

Monday, 04 April

RE: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
RE: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Mark Tinka
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Mark Tinka
Re: is it still nfsen? John Kristoff
opendkim (was: Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email) Bjørn Mork
Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Masataka Ohta
Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Dave Taht
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Masataka Ohta
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Dave Taht
Re: opendkim Bjørn Mork
Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Mark Tinka
Re: V6 still not supported Francis Booth via NANOG
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Masataka Ohta
Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
Re: is it still nfsen? Dave
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Nicholas Warren
IP Reputation Services Mike Hammett
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Andy Smith
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Greco
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
Re: IPv6 Only Jacques Latour
Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Robert Kisteleki
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Robert Kisteleki
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Andy Ringsmuth
Re: IP Reputation Services Anne Mitchell
2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Job Snijders via NANOG
Re: [nanog] opendkim (was: Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email) Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
Re: IP Reputation Services Laura Smith via NANOG
Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: IP Reputation Services Damian Menscher via NANOG
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Dave Bell
Re: antique CGN complaints, was V6 still not supported John Levine
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Kenneth Finnegan
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Jon Lewis
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Wes George
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Job Snijders via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Matthew Petach via NANOG
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Jon Lewis
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Job Snijders via NANOG
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Nick Hilliard
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Tom Beecher
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Kenneth Finnegan
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Tom Beecher
Re: [nanog] Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Jon Sands
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) John Gilmore
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Jon Sands
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) babydr DBA James W. Laferriere
Re: [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 John Curran
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) John Curran
Re: [nanog] Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 Jon Lewis
RPKI adoption (was: Re: 2749 routes AT RISK ) John Curran
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Aftab Siddiqui
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Rubens Kuhl
Re: [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 John Curran
Is it time to bring back the IPv6-only hour (well, half hour)? Matthew Petach via NANOG
Re: [nanog] Re: [nanog] Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
Re: [nanog] Re: [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
Re: [nanog] [nanog] Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - John Curran
Re: [nanog] [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - John Curran

Tuesday, 05 April

RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Dave Bell
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Dave Bell
Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
RE: Let's Focus on Moving Forward Re: V6 still not supported re: 202203261833.AYC Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon
Re: ICANN Survey on DNS Suffix Usage and New gTLD Delegation Casey Deccio
Re: V6 still not supported Jose Luis Rodriguez
Re: More product suggestions: small/cheap IS-IS or VXLAN devices? Pierre LANCASTRE
RE: More product suggestions: small/cheap IS-IS or VXLAN devices? Adam Thompson
Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: 2749 routes AT RISK ) Livingood, Jason via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: antique CGN complaints, was V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 John Curran
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
Re: Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) John Curran
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Rubens Kuhl
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) J. Hellenthal via NANOG
Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) William Herrin

Wednesday, 06 April

Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) John Curran
FuboTV Geolocation Nicholas Warren
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Wes George
IP Multicast Persistent Duplicate Packet Issue Roman Islam
Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022) Jeff Behrns via NANOG
Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Now open - 2022 ARIN Community Grants for Internet infrastructure development/research projects John Curran
Re: IP Multicast Persistent Duplicate Packet Issue Jared Mauch
Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown
Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) William Herrin
Looking for an Amazon Cloudfront contact Eric Kuhnke
Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) John Curran
Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Re: V6 still not supported Mark Andrews
Re: IP Multicast Persistent Duplicate Packet Issue Jared Mauch
Re: IP Multicast Persistent Duplicate Packet Issue Roman Islam
Puerto Rico (island-wide) power outage Sean Donelan
Re: [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) Owen DeLong via NANOG

Thursday, 07 April

Re: [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 John Curran
NANOG 85 Hackathon Call for Projects Valerie Wittkop
Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) John Curran
AT& T peering Contact? Justin Wilson (Lists)
Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) John Curran
Re: [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: Puerto Rico (island-wide) power outage Sean Donelan
Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 John Curran
Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) Owen DeLong via NANOG
Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) John Curran
Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT) John Curran
gitlab contact? Dave Taht
Hackathon Registration Opens + Scholarship Applications Available + More Nanog News
Re: gitlab contact? Matthew Petach
Re: Puerto Rico (island-wide) power outage Sean Donelan
People trying to sell "ARIN Leads" Jon Sands

Friday, 08 April

Re: People trying to sell "ARIN Leads" John Curran
Re: "Permanent" DST Mark Tinka
Re: People trying to sell "ARIN Leads" Jon Lewis
Ready to compromise? was RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Re: People trying to sell "ARIN Leads" Randy Bush
Re: People trying to sell "ARIN Leads" Tom Beecher
Spoofer Report for NANOG for Mar 2022 CAIDA Spoofer Project
Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
RE: People trying to sell "ARIN Leads" nanog () jima us
Re: People trying to sell "ARIN Leads" Rob Seastrom
Re: People trying to sell "ARIN Leads" Sabri Berisha
Re: Puerto Rico (island-wide) power outage Sean Donelan
Re: People trying to sell "ARIN Leads" John Curran
Re: People trying to sell "ARIN Leads" Rob Seastrom
Re: People trying to sell "ARIN Leads" John Curran

Saturday, 09 April

Re: Puerto Rico (island-wide) power outage Sean Donelan
Re: Puerto Rico (island-wide) power outage Sean Donelan
Re: Puerto Rico (island-wide) power outage Sean Donelan

Sunday, 10 April

Re: Puerto Rico (island-wide) power outage - RESOLVED Sean Donelan

Monday, 11 April

Something observed while doing IRR cleanup (generic name collisions) Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
Re: Something observed while doing IRR cleanup (generic name collisions) Job Snijders via NANOG
Fwd: Fw: HOST IRR Retirement Ross Tajvar
Re: Fwd: Fw: HOST IRR Retirement babydr DBA James W. Laferriere

Tuesday, 12 April

RE: Fwd: Fw: HOST IRR Retirement Adam Thompson
A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption Doug Barton
Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption John Curran
Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption Doug Barton

Wednesday, 13 April

Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption William Herrin
Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption Alex Band
Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption John Curran
Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption John Curran
Re: A way that ARIN can help encourage RPKI adoption Alex Band
Oahu HI undersea cable attack disrupted by federal agents Sean Donelan
Hulu Contact? Jason Lamb
Call for Participation -- ICANN DNSSEC and Security Workshop for ICANN74 Policy Forum Jacques Latour
Re: Hulu Contact? Josh Luthman

Thursday, 14 April

fs.com Ethernet switches Richard Angeletti
Re: fs.com Ethernet switches Chris Adams
Re: fs.com Ethernet switches Paschal Masha
Re: fs.com Ethernet switches Josh Luthman
Copper Termination Blocks Mike Hammett
Re: Copper Termination Blocks Dave Phelps
ping across infomart ix, please Randy Bush
Re: ping across infomart ix, please Randy Bush
Re: ping across infomart ix, please Randy Bush
Re: Copper Termination Blocks Shawn L via NANOG
Keep Ukraine Connected Markus
Re: Ready to compromise? was RE: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Copper Termination Blocks Martin Hannigan
Re: Copper Termination Blocks Grant Taylor via NANOG
Re: Copper Termination Blocks Shane Ronan

Friday, 15 April

Re: Copper Termination Blocks nanog
FYI - ARIN submission in response to FCC 22-90 on Secure Internet Routing John Curran
Re: Copper Termination Blocks Mike Hammett
Re: Copper Termination Blocks Mike Hammett
Re: Copper Termination Blocks Tom Beecher
Re: Copper Termination Blocks Tom Beecher
Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
Re: Copper Termination Blocks Martin Hannigan
Re: Copper Termination Blocks bzs

Saturday, 16 April

Re: are underwater routers a thing? Mark Tinka
Re: are underwater routers a thing? Dave Taht

Wednesday, 20 April

RE: Ready to compromise? was RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
Fiber Companies For Sale List / Fiber ISP's for sale Christopher Wolff
NXDOMAIN Resolvers Antonia Affinito
Re: NXDOMAIN Resolvers William Herrin
Re: NXDOMAIN Resolvers William Herrin
Re: NXDOMAIN Resolvers Matthew Pounsett
RE: NXDOMAIN Resolvers Brian Turnbow via NANOG

Thursday, 21 April

Direct fibre between Digital Realty ATL2 and Equinox AT1 Stefan Funke
Geolocation data management practices? Shawn
Re: NXDOMAIN Resolvers Thomas Mieslinger
Re: Geolocation data management practices? Job Snijders via NANOG
Re: Geolocation data management practices? Rubens Kuhl
Re: Geolocation data management practices? Josh Luthman
Re: Geolocation data management practices? Charles Polisher
Fall 2022 NANOG Registration Price Increase Edward McNair
Re: Ready to compromise? was RE: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Geolocation data management practices? Justin Krejci

Friday, 22 April

Any sign of supply chain returning to normal? Drew Weaver
Re: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal? Joe Freeman
Re: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal? Ryan Wilkins
Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
RE: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal? aaron1
Re: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal? Laura Smith via NANOG
RE: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal? nanog () jima us
Re: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal? George Metz
Re: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal? Tom Mitchell
Re: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal? Randy Bush
Re: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal? Shane Ronan

Saturday, 23 April

Re: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal? Hank Nussbacher

Sunday, 24 April

Re: Any sign of supply chain returning to normal? Masataka Ohta

Monday, 25 April

ARIN 49 is now starting - webcast and remote participation details John Curran
NANOG 85 Attendee List Announcement Nanog News
RE: fs.com Ethernet switches Adam Thompson
Seeing a lot of ROUTING-FIB-3-UPD_MSG_TOO_BIG messages today Drew Weaver
Re: Seeing a lot of ROUTING-FIB-3-UPD_MSG_TOO_BIG messages today Saku Ytti
RE: Seeing a lot of ROUTING-FIB-3-UPD_MSG_TOO_BIG messages today Drew Weaver
Re: Seeing a lot of ROUTING-FIB-3-UPD_MSG_TOO_BIG messages today Dale W. Carder
Re: Seeing a lot of ROUTING-FIB-3-UPD_MSG_TOO_BIG messages today Saku Ytti
Comcast/Florida Joe Carroll

Tuesday, 26 April

Re: Comcast/Florida JeffP
Dark\Conduit Pricing Mike Hammett
Re: Comcast/Florida J. Hellenthal via NANOG
Could people with experience with ARIN's IRR API contact me off-list? Dan Mahoney (Gushi)

Wednesday, 27 April

Sabotage: several severed cables at the origin of a major internet outage in France Sean Donelan
Re: Sabotage: several severed cables at the origin of a major internet outage in France Paul Ferguson
Re: Sabotage: several severed cables at the origin of a major internet outage in France Nick Hilliard
FCC to Consider New Rules to Combat International Scam Robocalls Sean Donelan
Re: FCC to Consider New Rules to Combat International Scam Robocalls Michael Thomas
Re: FCC to Consider New Rules to Combat International Scam Robocalls Jay Hennigan
RE: FCC to Consider New Rules to Combat International Scam Robocalls Keith Medcalf
Re: FCC to Consider New Rules to Combat International Scam Robocalls Abraham Y. Chen
Re: Sabotage: several severed cables at the origin of a major internet outage in France Hank Nussbacher

Thursday, 28 April

Re: FCC to Consider New Rules to Combat International Scam Robocalls Jon Lewis
Hetzner having issues Mukund Sivaraman
Disney+ Issues Norman Jester
Re: FCC to Consider New Rules to Combat International Scam Robocalls Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)

Friday, 29 April

Re: FCC to Consider New Rules to Combat International Scam Robocalls Mike Hammett
RE: Disney+ Issues Brian Turnbow via NANOG
Re: Disney+ Issues Jim Troutman
Re: Disney+ Issues Josh Luthman
Central place to register usages of various IP space? Drew Weaver
Re: Disney+ Issues Paul Thornton
Re: Disney+ Issues Josh Luthman
Re: Central place to register usages of various IP space? Tom Beecher
Re: Disney+ Issues Nate Burke
Re: Disney+ Issues Nick Suan via NANOG
Re: Disney+ Issues Brian Ellwood via NANOG
Re: Disney+ Issues Francis Booth via NANOG
Re: Disney+ Issues Norman Jester
Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report Routing Table Analysis Role Account
Re: Disney+ Issues Justin Krejci
Re: Disney+ Issues Paul Thornton
Centurylink\Lumen Mike Hammett
how networking happens in Hawaii scott via NANOG
Re: Disney+ Issues bzs

Saturday, 30 April

Re: how networking happens in Hawaii Christopher Morrow
Re: how networking happens in Hawaii Randy Bush
Re: how networking happens in Hawaii scott via NANOG
Re: how networking happens in Hawaii Donald Eastlake
Re: how networking happens in Hawaii Randy Bush
Re: how networking happens in Hawaii William Herrin
Re: how networking happens in Hawaii scott via NANOG

Previous period

Next period