nanog mailing list archives
RE: V6 still not supported
From: "Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\) via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 11:22:02 +0000
He he, why do you think YADA starts with yet another? The devil is in the details I guess. AA makes A twice longer, that's the easy piece. But then, what is the story for the A->AA transition? The key piece the concept of the shaft, that enables to transit AA between levels while seeing plain IPv4 in each realm. It is as necessary for parallel planes as RFC 1918 is necessary for the private domains. In fact that could be seen as the reverse. The Internet connects multiple private domains using NATs. The shaft connects multiple internets using IP-in-IP. But it has to be the exact same (assigned) IPv4 footprint at every layer. But for any of that to happen you need at least a IANA assignment and a Linux or two that play ball. We need to think that through before we waste the last IPv4 free land, or assign 240.0.0.0/4 Agreed, the publication for the link below day is incredibly timely. Such is the request to pay for natural resources with a declining currency. Let us assign the YADA prefix and start experiment 2, baby step 1. Keep safe; Pascal
-----Original Message----- From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com> Sent: vendredi 1 avril 2022 12:32 To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert () cisco com> Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: V6 still not supportedAre you ready for that, or should we wait another 80 years with dual stackand gigantic stateful NATs? That's what this network is going to do: https://www.aa.net.uk/etc/news/ipv6-end-of-trial/ There is something odd about the day this was published, though. Rubens
Current thread:
- RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Apr 01)
- Re: V6 still not supported Rubens Kuhl (Apr 01)
- RE: V6 still not supported Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Apr 01)
- Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Apr 01)
- Re: V6 still not supported Matthew Petach (Apr 02)
- Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Apr 02)
- RE: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Apr 04)
- Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Apr 06)
- Message not available
- Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Apr 06)
- Re: V6 still not supported Matthew Petach (Apr 02)
- Re: V6 still not supported Rubens Kuhl (Apr 01)
- Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Apr 02)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Masataka Ohta (Apr 03)