nanog mailing list archives
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 14:12:50 +0200
On 4/4/22 03:06, Dave Taht wrote:
I'm actually not here to start a debate... happy to learn that the v4 over v6 feature I'm playing with actually exists in another protocol, mainly. I'm critically dependent on source specific routing, also, so I am hoping there's an isis or ospf that can do what I need, or now that I have more routers with enough memory, switch back to an ibgp.
Are MPLS or SR too heavy a bat?
yes, and for smaller networks that are interconnecting, bgp can be too heavyweight also.
I know tons of small networks using Mikrotik to run their BGP backbone. Seems to work :-).
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- Re: V6 still not supported Matthew Petach (Apr 02)
- Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Apr 02)
- RE: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Apr 04)
- Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Apr 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Apr 06)
- Message not available
- Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Apr 06)
- Re: V6 still not supported Matthew Petach (Apr 02)
- Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Apr 02)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Masataka Ohta (Apr 03)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Dave Taht (Apr 03)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Mark Tinka (Apr 04)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Dave Taht (Apr 04)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Masataka Ohta (Apr 04)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Mark Tinka (Apr 04)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Masataka Ohta (Apr 04)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Dave Taht (Apr 03)
- RE: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Apr 03)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Mark Tinka (Apr 04)