nanog mailing list archives
Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 06:50:14 -0700
The other question for this list I'd basically had was this:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6
Please let me know if you feel that it should be possible to completely disable v4-via-v6 even on newer kernels, and whether you feel that v4-via-v6 should be disabled by default. (The "Security Considerations" section of the draft cited above might be interesting.)"
Current thread:
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols, (continued)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Dave Taht (Apr 04)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Masataka Ohta (Apr 04)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Mark Tinka (Apr 04)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Masataka Ohta (Apr 04)
- RE: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Apr 04)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Masataka Ohta (Apr 04)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Dave Taht (Apr 03)
- RE: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG (Apr 03)
- Re: V4 via V6 and IGP routing protocols Mark Tinka (Apr 04)
- Re: V6 still not supported Ryland Kremeier (Apr 01)
- Re: V6 still not supported Abraham Y. Chen (Apr 04)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Apr 04)
- Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Apr 04)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Apr 05)