Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Destroying PCs remotely?
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:45:41 -0400
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 02:45:51PM -0400, JT said:
the sunset clause, which they are attempting. Also, are you under some dilusion that there are a finite number of "bad" people out there. You think
Are you under the dElusion that there are an infinite number of people capable and willing to perform large-scale terrorist acts? If so, please explain why they don't happen daily, and where the infinite number of people are stored. (Hint: "everywhere".)
you can just eradicate them all? You believe that if they are captured they pose no threat? Oh boy....you really do live in some sort of dreamworld.
Yes, I believe that no further terrorist acts have been committed by the folks we're holding in lockup in Guantanamo Bay. If you have some evidence as to the attacks they've committed since being locked up, I'll be glad to look at it. Further, I believe that no further terrorist acts have been committed by the ones we've killed. If you have some evidence as to the attacks they've committed since being killed, I'll be glad to look at it.
It's a pity you can't stay on the argument at hand which had to do with remotely destroying someones pc for copyright infringement. Please relate that to 9/11 for me somehow cause I see no correlation. My comment about the
You referenced the Patriot Act as being an example of wrongdoing on Hatch's part. Are you honestly trying to say that this is not a point open to debate, and further that anyone involved in the discussion should have "just known" that it wasn't open for debate?
patriot act was to demonstrate Hatch's past history, in no way did I relate it to 9/11.
The fact that you didn't relate it does not make it not related.
It's already been proven that the reason 9/11 happened was due to a breakdown in intel. communication between departments. Please explain
Yes; and part of what the Patriot Act does is make it LEGAL for those departments to communicate in the necessary ways. It wasn't before.
continues to provide a false sense of security. They've already demonstrated within 1 month of 9/11 that another plane could be taken easily, so it would seem you are not so safe.
Exactly why we needed reforms of the laws regarding how we defend ourselves. You'll note that there have been no more successful large-scale attacks, despite the presence of more attackers. You'll further note that we've been capturing and/or killing the tangoes in literally record numbers. And, for the "it's not temporary" folks, have let quite a few people go after it was determined that they no longer posed a clear and present threat. -- Shawn McMahon | Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, EIV Consulting | that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any UNIX and Linux | hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure http://www.eiv.com| the survival and the success of liberty. - JFK
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely?, (continued)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 18)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Shawn McMahon (Jun 19)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 19)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Shawn McMahon (Jun 19)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Benjamin Krueger (Jun 19)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Jeremiah Cornelius (Jun 19)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 19)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Shawn McMahon (Jun 19)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? Rick Thompson (Jun 19)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 19)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Shawn McMahon (Jun 19)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 19)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Justin (Jun 19)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 19)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Shawn McMahon (Jun 20)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 20)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Shawn McMahon (Jun 20)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 21)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Ron DuFresne (Jun 19)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Shawn McMahon (Jun 20)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Ron DuFresne (Jun 18)