Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Destroying PCs remotely?
From: "JT" <ptourvi1 () twcny rr com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:56:56 -0400
Again, let me know when you eradicate evil as you think these laws will allow. You believe, by your own statements, that you can actually stop every terrorist present and future and that one day, there will be no terrorists, aka people who disagree and take things to an extreme. Good luck
-----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of Shawn McMahon Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:51 AM To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Destroying PCs remotely? On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 07:18:34PM -0400, JT said:Are you under the dElusion that there are an infinitenumber of peoplecapable and willing to perform large-scale terrorist acts? If so,Yes I am, they are called babies, they then grow up and arebeing trained byage 12 to kill. You must think terrorism just started thisgeneration? Youdo realize there were terrorists before you were bornright? They do happendaily, just because they don't happen in the US does notmean they don'thappen. You must think if you don't see it on the news,it's not happening. I'm sorry, are you unfamiliar with the term large-scale? Or are you just not reading these things at all before you reply to them?It's generally agreed that the patriot act takes away toomany liberties soI would not be debating that point at all. I believe thedebate after that Yes, everybody believes that, which is why it didn't get passed by a majority of both houses of Congress, and a majority of Americans don't support it in surveys. Oh, wait, it *DID* get passed by majorities in both houses, and surveys *DO* show most Americans support it. Yeah, that's general agreement.is only whether or not you support them taking away ourrights under theguise of security....and I know where you stand on that.Having any laws at all is taking away our rights under the guise of security. Unless you're an anarchist, we differ only in degree here.OK, then lets use your logic above, please explain whythere have been no9/11's in the past even without the patriot act.Mostly, due to the fact that the US prior to 1992 acted strongly to curtail these groups from developing to the point where they could afford something like this. Between 1992 and 2000 the intelligence agencies got seriously undermined, both in terms of ability to surveil and ability to interdict.More attackers? I thought we locked/killed them? You'llnote that they couldhave SUCCESSFULLY CARRIED OUT AN ATTACK EVEN AFTER THEPATRIOT ACT WASSIGNED, the airports are still insecure. Wow, we can killsubstabdard And yet, thanks in part to the Patriot Act, we foiled the attempt to cut the cables on the Brooklyn Bridge during rush hour. In any event, the fact that one particular piece of legislation does not in and of itself entirely correct all the problems immediately does not in any way indicate that it does nothing to correct any of the problems. As I've stated a number of times, and as you'd know if you'd read the goddamn thing, it addresses one of the major issues that everybody has been bitching about, with good reason; the fact that the CIA and FBI couldn't share notes. That alone would likely have stopped 9/11.about. Please note how they still kill us also though. Alsoplease note it'sgenerally believed the people crashing the planes did nothave a connectionwith the people we are now killing in record numbers."generally believed" by whom? The same folks who "generally believe" that UFOs are stealing our rural citizens to perform anal probes? Every time you believe something, you characterize it as "general belief". -- Shawn McMahon | Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, EIV Consulting | that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any UNIX and Linux | hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure http://www.eiv.com| the survival and the success of liberty. - JFK
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely?, (continued)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Jeremiah Cornelius (Jun 19)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 19)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Shawn McMahon (Jun 19)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? Rick Thompson (Jun 19)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 19)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Shawn McMahon (Jun 19)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 19)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Justin (Jun 19)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 19)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Shawn McMahon (Jun 20)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 20)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Shawn McMahon (Jun 20)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? JT (Jun 21)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Ron DuFresne (Jun 19)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Shawn McMahon (Jun 20)
- Re: Destroying PCs remotely? Ron DuFresne (Jun 18)
- RE: Destroying PCs remotely? Ron DuFresne (Jun 18)