RE: Destroying PCs remotely?

["Rick Thompson" <rthompson () rrmm net>]

Recently, they very much wanted to make it NOT temporary as well, but cooler
heads prevailed.  Unfortunately, history shows that they will reintroduce
the measure as many times as necessary to get it passed as part of some
unrelated legislation.  We'll see how much you support it when they tag you
as a terrorist with no proof.

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com]On Behalf Of Shawn
McMahon
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:14 PM
To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Destroying PCs remotely?


<snip>

Well, as both of my sentences clearly state, the restriction of
liberties is temporary.  The enhancment of security is permanent in that
if the terrorists are captured and/or killed, they no longer pose a
threat.

</snip>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html