Re: Destroying PCs remotely?

[Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>]

On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 12:58:51PM -0400, JT said:
> Yeah, I remember that last Senator who made an "off the cuff remark" I
> believe he was forced to step down from his position. I read the news

Leadership position, not from his Senate seat.  But, yes; because
Republicans won't tolerate racism from our folks.  Where're Byrd's
walking papers?

> Please reread and comprehend the above statement first. The business/lobby
> groups control him via campaign contributions and other money. Had I said

Which doesn't prevent you from voting against him, nor make it
intolerable that others vote for him.

> > TEMPORARY
> > security.  It inconveniences liberties for permanent security.
>
> Contradict yourself some more for me would you? Last email you said:
>
> "The Patriot Act amounts to short-term inconvenience for a few, that the
> many might live." 
>
> So which is it Shawn, temp or permanent?!?!? By law, it's supposed to be

Well, as both of my sentences clearly state, the restriction of
liberties is temporary.  The enhancment of security is permanent in that
if the terrorists are captured and/or killed, they no longer pose a
threat.

> someone who is so blatantly idiotic that they border on troll. The Patriot
> act has numerous problems. Maybe you should read more about the problems

Blowing 3,045 people up with airplanes has numerous problems, too.  It's
a pity you can't see that.  Fortunately, the vast majority of Americans
do, so for now I'll be safe against the way people like you would run
the country.


-- 
Shawn McMahon     | Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill,
EIV Consulting    | that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any
UNIX and Linux    | hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure
http://www.eiv.com| the survival and the success of liberty. - JFK

Attachment: _bin
Description: