Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Do you block P2P ?
From: Josh Richard <jrichar4 () D UMN EDU>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:18:36 -0500
We block P2P using a shaper. It has been very effective in reducing DMCA related complaints. Some games students use require BT to locate and play online games. If the game is newer, it is misclassed as BT and it does not work. Other legit apps suffer the same fate. In my opinion, that is an unfair model which leaves us to say not through words, but actions that you can use the Internet, but not all if it will work. We work with the vendor and participate in generating new classifications. Some work. Human nature wins and eventually we stop listening due to work 'that matters' or fires. This complaint can be generalized across all shapers which identify applications as the drift, update, drift, update problem. If anyone knows of an application based shaper which works differently, I would be interested in your experiences. Please do not misread my comments, I do not like application based shapers -- I struggle with the benefit vs. burden of the approach given the following: On the campus side, we are unshaped, open and the DMCA complaints are few and far between. Our guest wireless system is very different. It is web only, and uses a protocol agnostic rate limiting technique to limit the aggregate traffic to a specific rate. From there, I used a queuing discipline (SFQ) to ensure the resource was delivered in a nearly completely fair manner. This has worked very well. True fairness is achieved using an implementation of the Nagle algorithm provided through tc/tcng on GNU Linux. Philosophically, I feel the agnostic approach is more fair, sustainable and therefore, more correct. Columbia is not alone in the agnostic approach as others have taken this tack through this problem. For us, the difference between campus and reshall network behavior is one of end user education. Faculty and staff education has paid dividends. Regards, Josh Richard University of MN Duluth Duluth, MN
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Re: Do you block P2P ?, (continued)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Gregg, Christopher S. (Sep 04)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Cal Frye (Sep 05)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Cal Frye (Sep 05)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Miller, Duke (Sep 16)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Raymond, Jessica (Sep 17)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Joel Rosenblatt (Sep 17)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Stanclift, Michael (Sep 17)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Deke Kassabian (Sep 17)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Dan Oachs (Sep 17)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Massa, Michael (Sep 17)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Josh Richard (Sep 17)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Jeff Kell (Sep 17)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Jeff Kell (Sep 17)
- Re: Do you block P2P ? Stanclift, Michael (Sep 17)